Report Summary

  • 87

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

archives.depechemode.com

Depeche Mode: The Archives

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

325 ms

Resources Loaded

819 ms

Page Rendered

154 ms

archives.depechemode.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to archives.depechemode.com homepage info - get ready to check Archives Depeche Mode best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about archives.depechemode.com

The archives of Depeche Mode. From Dreaming Of Me to Heaven. From Speak And Spell to Spirit, and beyond.

Visit archives.depechemode.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Archives.depechemode.com page load time and found that the first response time was 325 ms and then it took 973 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

archives.depechemode.com performance score

87

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

65/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.038

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

archives.depechemode.com

325 ms

jquery.min.js

6 ms

archive.css

71 ms

css

24 ms

bgstretcher.js

189 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Archives.depechemode.com, 13% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 13% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (325 ms) belongs to the original domain Archives.depechemode.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 44.0 kB (26%)

Content Size

167.1 kB

After Optimization

123.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Archives.depechemode.com main page is 167.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 99.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 10.4 kB

  • Original 12.9 kB
  • After minification 7.8 kB
  • After compression 2.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.2 kB, which is 40% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 99.9 kB
  • After minification 97.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Archives Depeche Mode images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 17.5 kB

  • Original 38.3 kB
  • After minification 33.0 kB
  • After compression 20.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 17.5 kB or 46% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 13.5 kB

  • Original 15.9 kB
  • After minification 12.2 kB
  • After compression 2.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Archives.depechemode.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

11

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Archives Depeche Mode. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

archives.depechemode.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

archives.depechemode.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

archives.depechemode.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Archives.depechemode.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Archives.depechemode.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Archives Depeche Mode. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: