2.6 sec in total
305 ms
2.1 sec
188 ms
Visit dailyrojgar.com now to see the best up-to-date Dailyrojgar content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about dailyrojgar.com
Visit dailyrojgar.comWe analyzed Dailyrojgar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 305 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
dailyrojgar.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value4.8 s
30/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value340 ms
74/100
30%
Value0.079
94/100
15%
Value6.7 s
57/100
10%
305 ms
162 ms
283 ms
177 ms
138 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Dailyrojgar.com, 28% (25 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 9% (8 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (456 ms) relates to the external source Facebook.com.
Page size can be reduced by 76.4 kB (23%)
329.0 kB
252.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Dailyrojgar.com main page is 329.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 229.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.8 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 262 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dailyrojgar images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 33.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 33.0 kB or 14% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dailyrojgar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.9 kB or 70% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (71%)
82
24
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dailyrojgar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
dailyrojgar.com
305 ms
style.css
162 ms
jquery-1.8.2.min.js
283 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
177 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
138 ms
element.js
34 ms
css
24 ms
bg_header.png
95 ms
flogo.jpg
190 ms
pointer2.png
60 ms
icon1.png
94 ms
icon2.png
56 ms
icon3.png
134 ms
icon4.png
135 ms
New_image.gif
186 ms
translateelement.css
59 ms
main.js
91 ms
widgets.js
22 ms
pointer1.png
114 ms
bg_menu.png
74 ms
nav-li-bg.png
114 ms
outer_mid.png
114 ms
bg_search_shadow.png
140 ms
search.png
143 ms
mid-nav-bg.png
161 ms
veiw-bg.png
144 ms
bg_footer.png
153 ms
analytics.js
8 ms
webengage-min-v-4.0.js
46 ms
-g5pDUSRgvxvOl5u-a_WHw.woff
38 ms
HqHm7BVC_nzzTui2lzQTDT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
39 ms
bH7276GfdCjMjApa_dkG6T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
39 ms
element_main.js
50 ms
timeline.5d8406ab2e764a871ed41bd9aa0b693f.js
69 ms
collect
55 ms
translate_24dp.png
43 ms
l
50 ms
cleardot.gif
56 ms
collect
84 ms
gz.js
20 ms
syndication
107 ms
525604319295328259
233 ms
likebox.php
456 ms
v4.js
42 ms
te_ctrl3.gif
27 ms
upf.js
32 ms
l3.jpg
42 ms
feedback-widget-close.png
11 ms
~537e09f.png
447 ms
feedback-tab-bg-dark.png
12 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
2 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
4 ms
axt0iQEx_normal.jpeg
121 ms
lEK1oKJ42kW.css
179 ms
CsWNZDQah6k.css
221 ms
C5OVmtCPyxQ.css
264 ms
6bIl72b-rkY.js
375 ms
TkV0upu1GVq.js
399 ms
mn6tHWuLI-Y.js
302 ms
x8BMxYCqTb9.js
305 ms
Fl_OEjo5L35.js
304 ms
UMeIUxuSxxa.js
421 ms
wRXOQ26LQ1k.js
410 ms
jOTDh_8cOj9.js
410 ms
VAFHT3WOlau.js
409 ms
xRbzcXUWYBl.js
420 ms
Pgc3fKJZhcQ.js
446 ms
K8Vhkfx1wbZ.js
450 ms
hOy0WYY2HjV.js
450 ms
HQOfxEpxsr8.js
448 ms
jot
23 ms
10256477_1552250971674143_3756657845717076991_n.jpg
249 ms
11148652_1639589212940318_2360995396750174626_n.jpg
369 ms
10277492_1504897263154449_7093403208411988494_n.jpg
369 ms
12795519_583872401761272_1402912681666383902_n.jpg
398 ms
1459984_360543147433986_2129230361418722988_n.jpg
370 ms
1235290_766045240075670_632297703_n.jpg
371 ms
12733549_226254367714056_4544481582162646321_n.jpg
434 ms
12644997_126400624409133_7084493232345385006_n.jpg
456 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
51 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
51 ms
css;base64,
2 ms
zKnBMXFoWrQ.css
56 ms
wYctoC62T5S.css
57 ms
8bAC_Ti0-BY.css
56 ms
yYpjf-HluYu.png
42 ms
VXcANLwwL5J.js
42 ms
50Trs1RKgUY.js
42 ms
dailyrojgar.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
dailyrojgar.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
dailyrojgar.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dailyrojgar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Dailyrojgar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dailyrojgar.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dailyrojgar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: