Tools & Wizards About Us
darkcoding.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 94

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

darkcoding.net

Graham King

Page Load Speed

51.4 sec in total

First Response

230 ms

Resources Loaded

8.5 sec

Page Rendered

42.7 sec

darkcoding.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Darkcoding content for Uzbekistan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about darkcoding.net

Solvitas perambulum

Visit darkcoding.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Darkcoding.net page load time and found that the first response time was 230 ms and then it took 51.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

darkcoding.net performance score

94

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

91/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

darkcoding.net

230 ms

www.darkcoding.net

1340 ms

style.css

317 ms

simple-payments.css

1349 ms

css

2256 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Darkcoding.net, 13% (3 requests) were made to Secure.gravatar.com and 13% (3 requests) were made to Duckduckgo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) relates to the external source Secure.gravatar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 388.8 kB (64%)

Content Size

602.8 kB

After Optimization

214.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Darkcoding.net main page is 602.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 329.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 38.1 kB

  • Original 54.3 kB
  • After minification 53.4 kB
  • After compression 16.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.1 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 74 B

  • Original 55.7 kB
  • After minification 55.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Darkcoding images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 217.2 kB

  • Original 329.4 kB
  • After minification 328.8 kB
  • After compression 112.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 217.2 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 133.5 kB

  • Original 163.4 kB
  • After minification 154.1 kB
  • After compression 30.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Darkcoding.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 133.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (62%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Darkcoding. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

darkcoding.net

darkcoding.net

230 ms

www.darkcoding.net

www.darkcoding.net

1340 ms

style.css

style.css

317 ms

simple-payments.css

simple-payments.css

1349 ms

css

css

2256 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

2834 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

2578 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

3847 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

3869 ms

gprofiles.js

gprofiles.js

3881 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

3835 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

3835 ms

e-201736.js

e-201736.js

3881 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

2657 ms

print-style.css

print-style.css

67 ms

header_summer.jpg

header_summer.jpg

2850 ms

search.html

search.html

1799 ms

feed-icon16x16.png

feed-icon16x16.png

1225 ms

rssbadge.gif

rssbadge.gif

1226 ms

logo_icon60.v101.png

logo_icon60.v101.png

878 ms

search_dropdown_homepage.v102.png

search_dropdown_homepage.v102.png

864 ms

hovercard.css

hovercard.css

262 ms

services.css

services.css

234 ms

Accessibility Review

darkcoding.net accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

darkcoding.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

darkcoding.net SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Darkcoding.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Darkcoding.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

darkcoding.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Darkcoding. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: