Tools & Wizards About Us
datingfield2.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

datingfield2.com

datingfield2.com

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

336 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

361 ms

datingfield2.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to datingfield2.com homepage info - get ready to check Datingfield 2 best content right away, or after learning these important things about datingfield2.com

Visit datingfield2.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Datingfield2.com page load time and found that the first response time was 336 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

datingfield2.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

ww38.datingfield2.com

336 ms

saledefault.css

11 ms

style.css

15 ms

skenzo.css

16 ms

iyfsearch.com

964 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Datingfield2.com, 17% (3 requests) were made to D1lxhc4jvstzrp.cloudfront.net and 17% (3 requests) were made to Iyfsearch.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (964 ms) relates to the external source Iyfsearch.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 7.6 kB (15%)

Content Size

50.5 kB

After Optimization

43.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Datingfield2.com main page is 50.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 37.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 2.1 kB
  • After minification 2.0 kB
  • After compression 915 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.2 kB or 56% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 37.2 kB
  • After minification 37.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Datingfield 2 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

  • Original 9.2 kB
  • After minification 9.2 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 5.8 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 653 B

  • Original 2.1 kB
  • After minification 2.1 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Datingfield2.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 653 B or 32% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (21%)

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Datingfield 2. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ww38.datingfield2.com

ww38.datingfield2.com

336 ms

saledefault.css

saledefault.css

11 ms

style.css

style.css

15 ms

skenzo.css

skenzo.css

16 ms

iyfsearch.com

iyfsearch.com

964 ms

px.js

px.js

80 ms

px.js

px.js

82 ms

min.js

min.js

15 ms

bodybg.png

bodybg.png

156 ms

logo.png

logo.png

156 ms

arrow.png

arrow.png

190 ms

browserfp.min.js

browserfp.min.js

188 ms

search-icon.png

search-icon.png

172 ms

kwbg.jpg

kwbg.jpg

154 ms

libg.png

libg.png

155 ms

browserfp.min.js

browserfp.min.js

79 ms

ubuntu-r.woff

ubuntu-r.woff

28 ms

ubuntu-b.woff

ubuntu-b.woff

38 ms

SEO Factors

datingfield2.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Datingfield2.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Datingfield2.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

datingfield2.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Datingfield 2. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: