Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

daylesford.com

Daylesford Organic

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

266 ms

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

621 ms

daylesford.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to daylesford.com homepage info - get ready to check Daylesford best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about daylesford.com

Award winning Organic food, drink, homeware, hampers & gifts | Daylesford Organic

Visit daylesford.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Daylesford.com page load time and found that the first response time was 266 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

daylesford.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.0 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,190 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.09

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.5 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

daylesford.com

266 ms

front-page.include.e8ad01.css

225 ms

widget.css

150 ms

front.css

152 ms

validation.css

152 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Daylesford.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Daylesford.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 971.9 kB (21%)

Content Size

4.6 MB

After Optimization

3.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Daylesford.com main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 30.0 kB

  • Original 38.4 kB
  • After minification 36.0 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 142.8 kB

  • Original 3.3 MB
  • After minification 3.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Daylesford images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 605.5 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 432.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 605.5 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 193.6 kB

  • Original 232.1 kB
  • After minification 220.4 kB
  • After compression 38.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Daylesford.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 193.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (47%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

32

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Daylesford. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

daylesford.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

daylesford.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

daylesford.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Daylesford.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Daylesford.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Daylesford. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: