Tools & Wizards About Us
debate.org.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

debate.org.uk

mission - Christian Muslim Debate

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

619 ms

Resources Loaded

4.6 sec

Page Rendered

150 ms

debate.org.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Debate content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about debate.org.uk

Designed to encourage mutual discussion and to give Muslims an opportunity to discover the truth about Christianity. Articles, links and debate mailing list

Visit debate.org.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Debate.org.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 619 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

debate.org.uk performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

70/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,620 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.2 s

25/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

debate.org.uk

619 ms

www.debate.org.uk

1908 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

366 ms

style.css

335 ms

frontend.css

259 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Debate.org.uk, 9% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Debate.org.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 503.7 kB (70%)

Content Size

723.2 kB

After Optimization

219.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Debate.org.uk main page is 723.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 372.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 36.4 kB

  • Original 44.4 kB
  • After minification 42.7 kB
  • After compression 8.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 347 B

  • Original 29.9 kB
  • After minification 29.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Debate images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 237.0 kB

  • Original 372.3 kB
  • After minification 360.3 kB
  • After compression 135.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 237.0 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 230.0 kB

  • Original 276.5 kB
  • After minification 267.8 kB
  • After compression 46.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Debate.org.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 230.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (34%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Debate. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

debate.org.uk

debate.org.uk

619 ms

www.debate.org.uk

www.debate.org.uk

1908 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

366 ms

style.css

style.css

335 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

259 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

896 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

344 ms

fdfootnotes.js

fdfootnotes.js

305 ms

audio-player.js

audio-player.js

501 ms

ga.js

ga.js

30 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

66 ms

header.png

header.png

118 ms

search.png

search.png

124 ms

up-on.png

up-on.png

121 ms

down-off.png

down-off.png

118 ms

up-off.png

up-off.png

115 ms

top2.png

top2.png

121 ms

repeat.png

repeat.png

216 ms

Debate-Website-Sliced_07.jpg

Debate-Website-Sliced_07.jpg

217 ms

box1.png

box1.png

244 ms

box2.png

box2.png

215 ms

sidebar-h.png

sidebar-h.png

580 ms

bottom4.png

bottom4.png

1268 ms

footer.png

footer.png

563 ms

printfriendly.js

printfriendly.js

57 ms

9trX86JNnPk

9trX86JNnPk

107 ms

www-embed-player-vflZsBgOl.css

www-embed-player-vflZsBgOl.css

65 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

87 ms

base.js

base.js

158 ms

6BOEML_YqI6cKINK5dmh8ZufcXg7sBa4jeB-I9gQ0xI.js

6BOEML_YqI6cKINK5dmh8ZufcXg7sBa4jeB-I9gQ0xI.js

44 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

44 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

95 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

107 ms

Accessibility Review

debate.org.uk accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

debate.org.uk best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

debate.org.uk SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Debate.org.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Debate.org.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

debate.org.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Debate. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: