1.3 sec in total
249 ms
728 ms
311 ms
Click here to check amazing Debellecourt content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about debellecourt.com
Visit debellecourt.comWe analyzed Debellecourt.com page load time and found that the first response time was 249 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Debellecourt.com rating and web reputation
debellecourt.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
72/100
10%
Value8.5 s
1/100
25%
Value9.1 s
13/100
10%
Value1,590 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.165
71/100
15%
Value14.1 s
9/100
10%
249 ms
21 ms
15 ms
21 ms
59 ms
Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Debellecourt.com, 91% (20 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Wix.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (249 ms) belongs to the original domain Debellecourt.com.
Page size can be reduced by 5.0 kB (3%)
190.3 kB
185.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Debellecourt.com main page is 190.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 101.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 4.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.1 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 57 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Debellecourt images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 357 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 462 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Debellecourt.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 462 B or 15% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (42%)
12
7
The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Debellecourt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
debellecourt.com
249 ms
fontFace.css
21 ms
styles.css
15 ms
jquery.min.js
21 ms
angular.min.js
59 ms
angular-locale_en.js
20 ms
angular-translate.min.js
19 ms
messages_en.js
57 ms
app.js
83 ms
conductAllInScope
188 ms
logo.png
48 ms
link-arrow.png
47 ms
cable-spaghetti-bg.jpg
47 ms
bcf54343-d033-41ee-bbd7-2b77df3fe7ba.woff
27 ms
d5af76d8-a90b-4527-b3a3-182207cc3250.woff
8 ms
8ac9e38d-29c6-41ea-8e47-4ae4d2b1a4e1.woff
26 ms
530dee22-e3c1-4e9f-bf62-c31d510d9656.woff
8 ms
9a2e4855-380f-477f-950e-d98e8db54eac.woff
36 ms
835e7b4f-b524-4374-b57b-9a8fc555fd4e.woff
25 ms
60be5c39-863e-40cb-9434-6ebafb62ab2b.woff
27 ms
5b4a262e-3342-44e2-8ad7-719998a68134.woff
26 ms
5b29e833-1b7a-40ab-82a5-cfd69c8650f4.woff
35 ms
debellecourt.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
debellecourt.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
debellecourt.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Debellecourt.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Debellecourt.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
debellecourt.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Debellecourt. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: