2.1 sec in total
322 ms
1.6 sec
180 ms
Click here to check amazing Delightbite content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about delightbite.com
Buy a domain and see how a premium domain can be the best investment. Your business starts here. Buy a domain today.
Visit delightbite.comWe analyzed Delightbite.com page load time and found that the first response time was 322 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
delightbite.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value5.2 s
23/100
25%
Value4.0 s
80/100
10%
Value740 ms
40/100
30%
Value0.078
95/100
15%
Value7.0 s
53/100
10%
322 ms
224 ms
116 ms
54 ms
114 ms
Our browser made a total of 125 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Delightbite.com, 10% (12 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 7% (9 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (392 ms) relates to the external source Connect.facebook.net.
Page size can be reduced by 722.0 kB (64%)
1.1 MB
412.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Delightbite.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 770.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.3 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Delightbite needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 513.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 513.7 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 169.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Delightbite.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 169.5 kB or 59% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 78 (76%)
102
24
The browser has sent 102 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Delightbite. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 49 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
delightbite.com
322 ms
monetate.js
224 ms
application.css
116 ms
ng-modal.css
54 ms
angular.min.js
114 ms
ng-modal.js
56 ms
google_analytics.js
49 ms
google_oauth.js
47 ms
bold_chat.js
83 ms
eloqua.js
79 ms
hotjar.js
83 ms
adroll.js
83 ms
impactRadius.js
93 ms
in.js
123 ms
api.js
116 ms
api:client.js
141 ms
app.js
92 ms
cookies.js
92 ms
socialMedia.js
92 ms
countryDropdown.js
101 ms
monetate.js
101 ms
index.js
101 ms
lander.js
101 ms
seoPages.js
112 ms
sitePages.js
112 ms
search.js
103 ms
modal.js
104 ms
forms.js
102 ms
tldSelector.js
102 ms
setFixedTop.js
110 ms
searchBar.js
99 ms
currency.js
94 ms
trust.js
93 ms
conversion.js
86 ms
tdfs-inner.css
93 ms
tdfs-temp.css
93 ms
thankyou.css
102 ms
entry.js
10 ms
css
24 ms
fontawesome.min.css
10 ms
bd-icons.min.css
11 ms
ga.js
40 ms
foundation-A136666-2811-40ba-bff2-3df3af8bc2ae1.min.js
33 ms
userspace
206 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
194 ms
recaptcha__en.js
340 ms
all.js
392 ms
332 ms
logo-header-2x.png
175 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
205 ms
307 ms
hotjar-10205.js
159 ms
elqCfg.min.js
150 ms
bg-main-hilight-fade.jpg
130 ms
bg-select.png
130 ms
bg-target-bd-icon.png
130 ms
__utm.gif
121 ms
foundation-tags-SD780-3f5b-4f28-957f-6e6dc25a7fc41.min.js
65 ms
postmessageRelay
144 ms
framework
151 ms
__utm.gif
80 ms
__utm.gif
80 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
26 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
62 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
78 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
76 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
24 ms
svrGP
143 ms
svrGP
143 ms
modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js
153 ms
114 ms
collect
182 ms
iframe
110 ms
anchor
137 ms
80 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
113 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
63 ms
svrGP.aspx
58 ms
1233565733-idpiframe.js
111 ms
xd_arbiter.php
182 ms
xd_arbiter.php
344 ms
styles__ltr.css
42 ms
-FHGegChvKELgmHNPF97Aj33qC9PBXl7UyexHItfpAU.js
26 ms
webworker.js
26 ms
logo_48.png
24 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
73 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
72 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
16 ms
iframerpc
73 ms
recaptcha__en.js
62 ms
vms.js
90 ms
roundtrip.js
39 ms
xd_arbiter.php
92 ms
542IK7HHBBFJJFENPFA7WX.js
30 ms
bc.pv
91 ms
fbevents.hashing.js
58 ms
out
11 ms
46 ms
10 ms
34 ms
out
33 ms
out
32 ms
out
32 ms
out
32 ms
out
33 ms
out
33 ms
out
33 ms
out
33 ms
37 ms
u.php
44 ms
adsct
114 ms
sync
19 ms
pixel
73 ms
54 ms
36 ms
bounce
23 ms
sd
21 ms
u.php
22 ms
u.php
24 ms
377928.gif
17 ms
u.php
29 ms
u.php
50 ms
u.php
25 ms
tap.php
26 ms
in
5 ms
delightbite.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
delightbite.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
delightbite.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Delightbite.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Delightbite.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
delightbite.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Delightbite. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: