7.8 sec in total
1.5 sec
5.4 sec
891 ms
Welcome to depotvergleich.com homepage info - get ready to check Depot Vergleich best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about depotvergleich.com
Depot Vergleich 2023 » Finden Sie den besten Aktiendepot Anbieter in unserem großen Broker Test! ✚ Jetzt Depot Vergleich checken und traden!
Visit depotvergleich.comWe analyzed Depotvergleich.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
depotvergleich.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
63/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value5.3 s
57/100
10%
Value730 ms
41/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.4 s
38/100
10%
1488 ms
26 ms
37 ms
23 ms
114 ms
Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Depotvergleich.com, 18% (19 requests) were made to Bilder.financeads.net and 6% (6 requests) were made to Js.financeads.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Depotvergleich.com.
Page size can be reduced by 712.2 kB (39%)
1.8 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Depotvergleich.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 918.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 196.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 196.3 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 65.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Depot Vergleich images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 304.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 304.6 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 146.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Depotvergleich.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 146.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (29%)
96
68
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Depot Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.depotvergleich.com
1488 ms
css
26 ms
css
37 ms
css
23 ms
jquery.js
114 ms
resizeMe.js
312 ms
public-min.js
217 ms
autoptimize_1193708421924f656b07236828eb58b4.js
373 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
182 ms
logo_DepotVergleich.com_1.png
232 ms
trust_header.png
234 ms
rang_1.png
235 ms
01_Logo_Flatex.png
598 ms
01_auszeichnungen.png
600 ms
stoerer.png
600 ms
rang_2.png
596 ms
logo_CortalConsors.jpg
598 ms
02_auszeichnungen_CortalConsors.png
597 ms
rang_3.png
600 ms
03_logo_Onvista.jpg
601 ms
03_auszeichnung_Onvista.png
604 ms
rang_4.png
601 ms
04_logo_LYNX.jpg
601 ms
04_auszeichnung_LYNX.png
602 ms
rang_5.png
603 ms
05_logo_degiro.jpg
603 ms
05_auszeichnung_degiro.png
672 ms
fazit.png
612 ms
gebuehren.png
619 ms
bank-note-209104_1280.jpg
729 ms
Checkliste.png
661 ms
Flatex-Kontoer%C3%B6ffnung.jpg
763 ms
Zielgruppe.png
722 ms
FAQs.png
728 ms
Flatex-Ordergeb%C3%BChren.jpg
992 ms
Marktausblick.png
778 ms
Vergleich.png
831 ms
Verbrauchertipps.png
837 ms
150501_Autorenprofil_Oliver_Schoch.jpg
837 ms
top3_empfehlungen_aktiendepot6.jpg
991 ms
150514_teasergrafik_sidebar41.jpg
1043 ms
CGXpU_uR_FUfdeyCjAWgZ-vvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.woff
27 ms
WtcvfJHWXKxx4x0kuS1kobO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
50 ms
nsLtvfQoT-rVwGTHHnkeJrO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
51 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
978 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
983 ms
Asap-Regular.ttf
810 ms
depotrechner.php
932 ms
analytics.js
34 ms
Asap-Bold.ttf
836 ms
depot_kuendigung_vorlage.jpg
871 ms
depot_testsieger.jpg
871 ms
fbds.js
362 ms
Forex_test.jpg
925 ms
counter.js
15 ms
collect
322 ms
t.php
322 ms
www.depotvergleich.com
1774 ms
BO_test.jpg
573 ms
kreditkartentest.jpg
606 ms
footer_logo.png
607 ms
Logo_Footer_DAB.png
614 ms
Logo_Footer_Consorsbank.png
668 ms
Logo_Footer_Captrader.png
670 ms
Logo_Footer_LYNX.png
674 ms
Logo_Footer_flatex.png
708 ms
Logo_Footer_benk.png
709 ms
Logo_Footer_DB.png
718 ms
Logo_Footer_OnVista.png
772 ms
Mann_neu.png
775 ms
118 ms
footer_redesign_risikohinweis.png
799 ms
scrollup.png
1951 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
619 ms
jquery.fa_qtip.css
212 ms
bootstrap.css
912 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
511 ms
jquery.ba-resize.min.js
217 ms
fa_style.php
437 ms
frau_titel.png
760 ms
jquery.fa_qtip2.js
314 ms
fa_starrating_layer2.js
108 ms
bootstrap.min.js
5 ms
boxover.js
319 ms
130.gif
409 ms
469.gif
506 ms
277.gif
702 ms
471_kl.gif
608 ms
157.gif
609 ms
481_kl.gif
616 ms
181.gif
723 ms
372_kl.gif
624 ms
134.gif
816 ms
191.gif
816 ms
207_kl.gif
721 ms
124.gif
848 ms
150.gif
814 ms
510_kl.gif
820 ms
209.gif
829 ms
107.gif
1015 ms
152.gif
927 ms
103.gif
928 ms
384_kl.gif
931 ms
Depotvergleich_popup_flatex_M.jpg
324 ms
spufont.woff
110 ms
25 ms
depotvergleich.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[role] values are not valid
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
depotvergleich.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
depotvergleich.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Depotvergleich.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Depotvergleich.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
depotvergleich.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Depot Vergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: