6.7 sec in total
78 ms
5.8 sec
812 ms
Visit designdisplay.com now to see the best up-to-date Design Display content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about designdisplay.com
Visit designdisplay.comWe analyzed Designdisplay.com page load time and found that the first response time was 78 ms and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
designdisplay.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.6 s
0/100
10%
Value25.2 s
0/100
25%
Value31.3 s
0/100
10%
Value23,780 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.161
72/100
15%
Value38.0 s
0/100
10%
78 ms
2894 ms
152 ms
190 ms
175 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Designdisplay.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Designdisplay.com.
Page size can be reduced by 928.8 kB (38%)
2.5 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Designdisplay.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Design Display images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 211.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 211.6 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 601.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Designdisplay.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 601.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (81%)
58
11
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Design Display. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
designdisplay.com
78 ms
designdisplay.com
2894 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
152 ms
style.min.css
190 ms
styles.css
175 ms
foobox.free.min.css
176 ms
font-awesome.css
169 ms
frontend.css
168 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
287 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
272 ms
frontend.min.css
368 ms
post-20.css
254 ms
all.min.css
296 ms
v4-shims.min.css
296 ms
global.css
388 ms
post-8.css
343 ms
font-awesome.min.css
379 ms
css
156 ms
style.min.css
502 ms
general.min.css
430 ms
css
156 ms
smartslider.min.css
489 ms
css
130 ms
jquery.min.js
532 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
432 ms
v4-shims.min.js
528 ms
foobox.free.min.js
563 ms
n2.min.js
994 ms
smartslider-frontend.min.js
1028 ms
ss-simple.min.js
995 ms
smartslider-backgroundanimation.min.js
1037 ms
w-bullet.min.js
1028 ms
animations.min.css
1055 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1483 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1486 ms
index.js
1539 ms
frontend.js
1540 ms
api.js
157 ms
index.js
1538 ms
theme.min.js
1559 ms
general.min.js
1561 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1587 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1684 ms
waypoints.min.js
1667 ms
core.min.js
1676 ms
swiper.min.js
1772 ms
share-link.min.js
1684 ms
dialog.min.js
1727 ms
frontend.min.js
1696 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
1710 ms
design-display-logo.png
1209 ms
tradeshow-slider1.jpg
1629 ms
environmental-slider2.jpg
1607 ms
museum-slider3.jpg
1680 ms
home-mid-sample.jpg
1677 ms
elo-logo.png
1565 ms
gsa.png
1588 ms
nimlok-authorized-distributor.png
1637 ms
orbus.png
1658 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1442 ms
recaptcha__en.js
85 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
422 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
423 ms
designdisplay.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
designdisplay.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
designdisplay.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Designdisplay.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Designdisplay.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
designdisplay.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Design Display. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: