3.2 sec in total
310 ms
2.4 sec
541 ms
Visit designpackaginginc.com now to see the best up-to-date Design Packaging Inc content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about designpackaginginc.com
Custom retail kitting, brand packaging and sewn products
Visit designpackaginginc.comWe analyzed Designpackaginginc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 310 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
designpackaginginc.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.4 s
1/100
10%
Value20.0 s
0/100
25%
Value25.1 s
0/100
10%
Value7,570 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.07
96/100
15%
Value26.1 s
0/100
10%
310 ms
16 ms
127 ms
112 ms
149 ms
Our browser made a total of 131 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Designpackaginginc.com, 14% (18 requests) were made to and 5% (7 requests) were made to W.soundcloud.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (850 ms) belongs to the original domain Designpackaginginc.com.
Page size can be reduced by 974.4 kB (15%)
6.4 MB
5.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Designpackaginginc.com main page is 6.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 58.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 115.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Design Packaging Inc images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 426.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 426.8 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 374.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Designpackaginginc.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 374.1 kB or 48% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (51%)
108
53
The browser has sent 108 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Design Packaging Inc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
designpackaginginc.com
310 ms
font-awesome.min.css
16 ms
designpackaginginc.com
127 ms
social-style.css
112 ms
social-icons.css
149 ms
array.css
142 ms
styles.css
158 ms
sb-instagram.css
142 ms
font-awesome.min.css
19 ms
plugin-styles.css
167 ms
video-js.css
62 ms
style.css
195 ms
style.css
217 ms
media-queries.css
214 ms
flexslider.css
216 ms
font-awesome.min.css
225 ms
wpp.css
228 ms
public.css
259 ms
styles.min.css
285 ms
jquery.js
353 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
288 ms
fonts.css
395 ms
widgets.js
17 ms
classic-081711.css
17 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
276 ms
jquery.form.min.js
250 ms
scripts.js
277 ms
sb-instagram.js
334 ms
custom.js
303 ms
owl.carousel.js
335 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
333 ms
jquery.tabs.min.js
343 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
369 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
371 ms
quicksand.js
370 ms
script.js
365 ms
view.min.js
383 ms
comment-reply.min.js
440 ms
combined.min.js
427 ms
script.min.js
440 ms
wp-embed.min.js
440 ms
6ZivuwyI_normal.jpg
11 ms
design-packaging-inc.png
124 ms
BirchBox_Creative_Packaging_Design.jpg
575 ms
Design-Packaging-Featured-Clients-3.3.jpg
167 ms
Design-Packaging-Featured-Clients-2.jpg
310 ms
Design-Packaging-Featured-Clients-1.jpg
245 ms
diane-von-furstenberg-dvf-box-design-packaging-company-thumb.jpg
371 ms
diane-von-furstenberg-dvf-box-design-packaging-company-1.1.jpg
377 ms
sephora-box-packaging-design-company-2.jpg
435 ms
maiyet-shopping-bag-design-packaging-company-2.jpg
435 ms
DPquote-No17.jpg
560 ms
12DF730529DC222EB.css
618 ms
viJwOyL4_normal.png
69 ms
Cb0vY7kWIAAdR5p.jpg
69 ms
reply_48x16.png
135 ms
retweet_48x16.png
135 ms
favorite_48x16.png
135 ms
alexander-wang-box-design-packaging-company-thumb.jpg
298 ms
coach-box-holiday-design-packaging-company-1.jpg
166 ms
alexander-wang-box-design-packaging-company-2.jpg
644 ms
maiyet-shopping-bag-design-packaging-company-3.jpg
234 ms
night-rider-jewelry-box-design-packaging-company-thumbnail.jpg
265 ms
night-rider-jewelry-box-design-packaging-company-3.jpg
775 ms
chateau-ste-michelle-wine-case-design-packaging-company-5.jpg
298 ms
mz-wallace-shopping-bag-design-packaging-company-2.jpg
530 ms
HOW-magazine-packaging-design.jpg
531 ms
NeutrogenaAward.jpg
529 ms
HOW-design-live-design-packaging.jpg
529 ms
BraunAward.jpg
594 ms
BarneysGagaAward.jpg
691 ms
HowAward.jpg
597 ms
DielineAward1.jpg
595 ms
AubergeAward1.jpg
659 ms
DylansAward1.jpg
751 ms
QuickSilverAward1.jpg
662 ms
CrateBarrelAward.jpg
708 ms
RedDoorSpaAward1.jpg
752 ms
PackprintAward.jpg
752 ms
ComputerArtsAward.jpg
834 ms
SolageAward1.jpg
774 ms
NeimanMarcusAward1.jpg
850 ms
SteMichelleAward1.jpg
831 ms
CreativeMornings1.jpg
832 ms
169 ms
loader.png
780 ms
foot-bg.gif
785 ms
AAP6PlE=
31 ms
D49
31 ms
E+KX5KmPjU=
31 ms
Qo+bzsrXSXLkYKL8vgh02EZ49ObnTd3fPifFL8Aotk+OQ==
31 ms
NZIc6gbyRPYuz5FoFwx3PgfcyrXUPJ+hV83nYkXSXLkYKL8vgh02EZ49ObnTd3fPifFL8AdSM+bQ==
30 ms
o+UQ==
30 ms
k+IXsvw+PQ==
32 ms
E+KX5KmPjU=
32 ms
iKvEJXWmnGGl8k8yKZRyRzrJR8nPXU9mJ1uMGb1VtIF4v3M8iSZHEm838p5PEDXu6tqFAJ+6P41kivcRiHKODefFaIM+gbyZMYe75FsLjjOfA+5tWuoWT9Cj5vOytdJcuRgovy+CHTYRnj05udN3d8+J8UvwCi2T45
33 ms
iWyO9xmEcooB781khzqBvJE9i7PkWgXDHc+B9zKtdQ8n6FXzediRdJcuRgovy+CHTYRnj05udN3d8+J8UvwB1Iz5t
32 ms
w26Tj79
31 ms
HlWYm+YO2GHF8l8yqZJyRzqpRs6PVY9nx93MG79XtIZ7N0MnyvzkT+L4UsecDLAqsSjeKf+bpmsrpoxjYquDecleIEulpLL4aq7xAY99IJmcgy3C0UomAl603L2pe6GEj4aZY8xDqOY3x+tsvsTo4vSv4baU8+6Q==
31 ms
w26Tj79
31 ms
HlWYm+YO2GHF8l8yqZJyRzqpRs6PVY9nx93MG79XtIZ7N0MnyvzkT+L4UsecDLAqsSjeKf+bpmsrpoxjYquDecleIEulpLL4aq7xAY99IJmcgy3C0UomAl603L2pe6GEj4aZY8xDqOY3x+tsvsTo4vSv4baU8+6Q==
30 ms
0n1CxQlPlU=
30 ms
k+IXwyc+QQ==
29 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
755 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
29 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
29 ms
0n1CxQlPlU=
27 ms
5PiF8MnPkE=
27 ms
320696385
102 ms
recent
170 ms
ga.js
60 ms
loghit.asp
633 ms
VisitorTrack.js
144 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
widget-ea7fb002.css
64 ms
12093540_575758645916421_1496937759_n.jpg
548 ms
1390411_1063251943741177_1370906671_n.jpg
664 ms
12748192_1680406698915646_1023916963_n.jpg
783 ms
11887155_1696536623965459_1122618132_n.jpg
735 ms
12750176_1089734131048617_408166213_n.jpg
735 ms
vt.aspx
81 ms
interstate-0ab59479718c8235122cad6b16a66953d725c43a.css
209 ms
widget-4cab6819.js
128 ms
logo-200x120-177df3dd.png
28 ms
ga.js
70 ms
visual-multi-sounds-3fc9613a.js
84 ms
error-698b3c1d.js
34 ms
beacon.js
80 ms
logo_grey-377f1b9e.png
37 ms
__utm.gif
50 ms
__utm.gif
45 ms
designpackaginginc.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
No form fields have multiple labels
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
designpackaginginc.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
designpackaginginc.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Designpackaginginc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Designpackaginginc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
designpackaginginc.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Design Packaging Inc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: