3.4 sec in total
733 ms
2.3 sec
356 ms
Click here to check amazing Designsonar content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about designsonar.com
Inspiration source for designer! Fancy and great product design, industrial design, concepts, architecture, interior design, photography and more stunning pictures!
Visit designsonar.comWe analyzed Designsonar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 733 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
designsonar.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value5.6 s
18/100
25%
Value8.7 s
16/100
10%
Value5,610 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.044
99/100
15%
Value9.5 s
30/100
10%
733 ms
11 ms
26 ms
9 ms
9 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Designsonar.com, 20% (11 requests) were made to 41.media.tumblr.com and 18% (10 requests) were made to Assets.tumblr.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source 36.media.tumblr.com.
Page size can be reduced by 687.6 kB (16%)
4.2 MB
3.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Designsonar.com main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 81.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 161.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Designsonar images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 424.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 424.7 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Designsonar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.9 kB or 44% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (35%)
49
32
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Designsonar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
designsonar.com
733 ms
pre_tumblelog.js
11 ms
css
26 ms
lightbox.css
9 ms
icon-embedded.css
9 ms
tumblelog_post_message_queue.js
13 ms
stylesheet.css
12 ms
script.js
16 ms
index.js
13 ms
x.gif
161 ms
ajax-loader.gif
157 ms
like_iframe.html
168 ms
tumblr_nl14180bti1qfkimjo1_500.jpg
171 ms
tumblr_nk9qj1jRdZ1qddxjwo3_500.jpg
273 ms
tumblr_nl9lsfZuAS1r0bs4no2_1280.jpg
164 ms
impixu
142 ms
impixu
93 ms
tumblr_nk9qj1jRdZ1qddxjwo1_1280.jpg
235 ms
tumblr_nk9qj1jRdZ1qddxjwo2_1280.jpg
306 ms
tumblr_nl9lsfZuAS1r0bs4no1_1280.jpg
205 ms
tumblr_nl9lsfZuAS1r0bs4no3_1280.jpg
966 ms
tumblr_nl9lsfZuAS1r0bs4no4_1280.jpg
256 ms
tumblr_nleblzZDmw1qddxjwo2_1280.jpg
346 ms
tumblr_nldlo2xS0o1qjr7k7o3_1280.jpg
286 ms
tumblr_mepwbrlKnA1qk21cfo1_500.jpg
282 ms
tumblr_lu0w0yVpN41r5blf5o1_500.jpg
624 ms
tumblr_nis7w5CB6P1tzelfko1_500.jpg
1310 ms
screen-pattern.png
32 ms
tumblr_nl9lsfZuAS1r0bs4no5_1280.jpg
91 ms
tumblr_nldfrc68Gm1slcsb6o1_500.jpg
86 ms
tumblr_nleblzZDmw1qddxjwo1_1280.jpg
102 ms
tumblr_nleblzZDmw1qddxjwo3_1280.jpg
91 ms
tumblr_nldlo2xS0o1qjr7k7o1_1280.jpg
90 ms
tumblr_nldlo2xS0o1qjr7k7o4_1280.jpg
88 ms
tumblr_nldlo2xS0o1qjr7k7o2_1280.jpg
91 ms
tumblr_nldlo2xS0o1qjr7k7o5_1280.jpg
103 ms
tumblr_nldlo2xS0o1qjr7k7o6_1280.jpg
104 ms
tumblr_nbf31zo4R01qh422go1_500.jpg
430 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
85 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
86 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
87 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMfEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
87 ms
ORqc2pKbUNUbRe9KzVsUsy9yFUi1lwydbKuFTztUsxSZpuXsnDcj1QoYQhWwufdyMkZtkvDkh0CUu4AMhSWLEBAY5ZuQgACABjILABI0SwAyNwsBFFICBLuAAOUUuwBlNaWLA0G7AoWWBmIIpVWLACJWGwAUVjI2KwAiNEsgoABiqyCgQGKrIQBAYqWbIEKAlFUkSyCgYHKrEGAUSxJAGIUViwQIhYsQYDRLEmAYhRWLgEAIhYsQYBRFlZWVm4Af+FsASNsQUARA==
23 ms
icon.svg
30 ms
analytics.html
102 ms
login_check.html
34 ms
avatar_9b8608269bd7_40.png
111 ms
iframe_logo.png
19 ms
rapid-3.36.js
39 ms
rapidworker-1.2.js
37 ms
ga.js
64 ms
analytics.js
50 ms
cs.js
60 ms
yql
155 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
cedexis.radar.js
60 ms
designsonar.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
designsonar.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
designsonar.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Designsonar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Designsonar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
designsonar.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Designsonar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: