Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

dibpak.com

Dubai Islamic Bank

Page Load Speed

26.5 sec in total

First Response

480 ms

Resources Loaded

16.8 sec

Page Rendered

9.1 sec

dibpak.com screenshot

About Website

Visit dibpak.com now to see the best up-to-date Dibpak content for Pakistan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about dibpak.com

The first Islamic bank to incorporate the principles of Sharia in all practices.

Visit dibpak.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Dibpak.com page load time and found that the first response time was 480 ms and then it took 26 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dibpak.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value470 ms

61/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.405

25/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.1 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

dibpak.com

480 ms

dibpak.com

869 ms

www.dibpak.com

1883 ms

bootstrap.min.css

41 ms

flaticon.css

434 ms

Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Dibpak.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Dibpak.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (8%)

Content Size

28.3 MB

After Optimization

26.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Dibpak.com main page is 28.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 26.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 53.4 kB

  • Original 66.2 kB
  • After minification 61.6 kB
  • After compression 12.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 513.6 kB

  • Original 26.1 MB
  • After minification 25.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dibpak images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 374.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 77% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 404.8 kB

  • Original 473.0 kB
  • After minification 409.3 kB
  • After compression 68.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dibpak.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 404.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (43%)

Requests Now

84

After Optimization

48

The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dibpak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

dibpak.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

SEO Factors

dibpak.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dibpak.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dibpak.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dibpak. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: