3.3 sec in total
332 ms
2.5 sec
427 ms
Welcome to dietdebate.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Dietdebate best content right away, or after learning these important things about dietdebate.co.uk
Visit dietdebate.co.ukWe analyzed Dietdebate.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 332 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
dietdebate.co.uk performance score
332 ms
101 ms
219 ms
321 ms
211 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 22% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Dietdebate.co.uk, 11% (9 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 10% (8 requests) were made to Mm-hmm.co.uk. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Mm-hmm.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 660.6 kB (66%)
1.0 MB
345.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Dietdebate.co.uk main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 912.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.8 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Dietdebate needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.3 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 593.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 593.1 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dietdebate.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 42.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (70%)
73
22
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dietdebate. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
dietdebate.co.uk
332 ms
style.css
101 ms
respon.css
219 ms
jquery.min.js
321 ms
scripts.js
211 ms
prettyPhoto.css
243 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
223 ms
superfish.css
705 ms
hoverIntent.js
338 ms
superfish.js
337 ms
supersubs.js
338 ms
show_ads.js
5 ms
widgets.js
78 ms
spcjs.php
1362 ms
adsbygoogle.js
6 ms
spcjs.php
1390 ms
tracking.js
84 ms
main_bg.png
139 ms
diets.gif
232 ms
fruit.gif
442 ms
ca-pub-2121528995419082.js
65 ms
zrt_lookup.html
126 ms
show_ads_impl.js
55 ms
plusone.js
179 ms
script_data.js
157 ms
ads
357 ms
osd.js
13 ms
localization.en.0.3632191afe35222a6b78c04d457adc0d.js
46 ms
ping
88 ms
open_chat.cgi
73 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
15 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
52 ms
fastbutton
114 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
99 ms
livechat-minimal_337558d286.ttf
45 ms
embedded.20160317113847.js
109 ms
postmessageRelay
73 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
21 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
22 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
76 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
75 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
16 ms
12678955693013123963
46 ms
abg.js
51 ms
m_js_controller.js
80 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
30 ms
s
35 ms
x_button_blue2.png
36 ms
plusone.js
68 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
4 ms
KT3KS9Aol4WfR6Vas8kNcg.woff
44 ms
wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff
44 ms
spc.php
112 ms
fl.js
128 ms
analytics.js
24 ms
ag.php
110 ms
lg.php
106 ms
ca-pub-8485356976216296.js
17 ms
ads
311 ms
collect
25 ms
collect
61 ms
ads
357 ms
ads
335 ms
prefooter_bg.png
160 ms
mailform-subscribe.png
127 ms
footer_bg.png
152 ms
spc.php
125 ms
14050120791027217831
34 ms
collect
74 ms
ads
77 ms
collect
72 ms
lg.php
206 ms
all.js
66 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
249 ms
175 ms
xd_arbiter.php
100 ms
xd_arbiter.php
117 ms
en.png
81 ms
icon.png
69 ms
dietdebate.co.uk SEO score
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dietdebate.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Dietdebate.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dietdebate.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dietdebate. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: