4.1 sec in total
412 ms
3.4 sec
287 ms
Click here to check amazing Digipedia content for Poland. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about digipedia.pl
Wybierz Digipedię i nie martw się o swoje kasyno. Poznaj najlepsze usługi z zakresu sprzętu kasynowego i postaw na zaufanego dostawcę oprogramowania.
Visit digipedia.plWe analyzed Digipedia.pl page load time and found that the first response time was 412 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
digipedia.pl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value7.0 s
32/100
10%
Value110 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.232
54/100
15%
Value6.4 s
59/100
10%
412 ms
56 ms
46 ms
54 ms
132 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Digipedia.pl, 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Digipedia.pl.
Page size can be reduced by 670.3 kB (82%)
815.4 kB
145.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Digipedia.pl main page is 815.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 553.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 6.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.2 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Digipedia needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.6 kB or 35% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 179.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 179.5 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 482.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digipedia.pl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 482.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (81%)
32
6
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digipedia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
digipedia.pl
412 ms
css
56 ms
bootstrap.min.css
46 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
54 ms
reset.css
132 ms
site.css
236 ms
container.css
240 ms
grid.css
449 ms
header.css
261 ms
image.css
262 ms
menu.css
373 ms
divider.css
357 ms
dropdown.css
466 ms
segment.css
385 ms
button.css
705 ms
list.css
585 ms
icon.css
601 ms
sidebar.css
541 ms
transition.css
683 ms
input.css
580 ms
wikifeedia.css
653 ms
style.css
703 ms
jquery.min.js
928 ms
visibility.js
719 ms
sidebar.js
894 ms
transition.js
796 ms
input.js
811 ms
wikifeedia.js
835 ms
script.js
854 ms
css
65 ms
logo.png
1128 ms
loader.gif
800 ms
analytics.js
41 ms
index.php
1920 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
80 ms
4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf
49 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
93 ms
icons.woff
650 ms
collect
14 ms
digipedia.pl accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
digipedia.pl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
digipedia.pl SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
PL
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digipedia.pl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Digipedia.pl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
digipedia.pl
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Digipedia. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: