8 sec in total
1.7 sec
5.7 sec
644 ms
Welcome to digitaltextilereview.com homepage info - get ready to check Digital Textile Review best content right away, or after learning these important things about digitaltextilereview.com
Advancing Industry Adoption of Digital Textile Printing
Visit digitaltextilereview.comWe analyzed Digitaltextilereview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Digitaltextilereview.com rating and web reputation
digitaltextilereview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
66/100
10%
Value2.8 s
83/100
25%
Value3.4 s
90/100
10%
Value300 ms
78/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.6 s
47/100
10%
1653 ms
1300 ms
979 ms
950 ms
1229 ms
Our browser made a total of 120 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 28% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Digitaltextilereview.com, 26% (31 requests) were made to Pixel.wp.com and 8% (10 requests) were made to Linkedin.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Digitaltextilereview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 382.5 kB (39%)
980.6 kB
598.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Digitaltextilereview.com main page is 980.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 398.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 79.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Digital Textile Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 156.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 156.5 kB or 51% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 142.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digitaltextilereview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 142.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 86 (74%)
117
31
The browser has sent 117 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digital Textile Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
digitaltextilereview.com
1653 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1300 ms
wpnb_frontEnd.css
979 ms
genericons.css
950 ms
style.css
1229 ms
jetpack.css
900 ms
wp-about-author.css
1019 ms
jquery.js
1313 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1276 ms
checkclicks.js
1146 ms
updateclicks.js
1237 ms
check_min.js
2023 ms
wpnb_frontEnd.js
2083 ms
jquery.sidr.min.js
2245 ms
html5.min.js
2172 ms
newspage.css
2124 ms
adsbygoogle.js
5 ms
photon.js
2201 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
8 ms
gprofiles.js
57 ms
wpgroho.js
2198 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
2198 ms
catchbox_slider.js
2759 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
2823 ms
navigation.js
2762 ms
catchbox-scrollup.min.js
2762 ms
wp-embed.min.js
2804 ms
sharing.js
3213 ms
e-201611.js
5 ms
Mutoh_RJ900_Knight_MaxiPress.png
1597 ms
Printhead-History-e1411123622552.png
151 ms
ART-SOUL-18-e1386798507409.jpg
1296 ms
dtg.png
1837 ms
10reasons.png
1637 ms
sgia_expo_lgog13_1633.jpg
1288 ms
BlogThumbnail01.jpg
1291 ms
dtrheader.png
1288 ms
Banner_250x125.png
1287 ms
rss.png
1285 ms
Rainbow-Ad.png
1285 ms
Ad_logo_01.png
1285 ms
loading.gif
1289 ms
close.png
1288 ms
Genericons.svg
1252 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
11 ms
ca-pub-4122351753819261.js
133 ms
zrt_lookup.html
32 ms
show_ads_impl.js
57 ms
ads
377 ms
osd.js
7 ms
13527716267647481937
36 ms
abg.js
39 ms
m_js_controller.js
55 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
30 ms
x_button_blue2.png
8 ms
s
28 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
3 ms
hovercard.css
91 ms
services.css
122 ms
share
99 ms
g.gif
70 ms
count.json
96 ms
graph.facebook.com
150 ms
share
87 ms
count.json
100 ms
graph.facebook.com
271 ms
share
90 ms
count.json
99 ms
graph.facebook.com
261 ms
share
133 ms
count.json
97 ms
graph.facebook.com
245 ms
share
83 ms
count.json
96 ms
graph.facebook.com
244 ms
share
82 ms
count.json
93 ms
graph.facebook.com
242 ms
share
90 ms
count.json
127 ms
graph.facebook.com
251 ms
share
121 ms
count.json
126 ms
graph.facebook.com
319 ms
share
121 ms
count.json
126 ms
graph.facebook.com
321 ms
share
118 ms
count.json
123 ms
graph.facebook.com
320 ms
g.gif
30 ms
g.gif
33 ms
g.gif
32 ms
g.gif
32 ms
g.gif
32 ms
g.gif
32 ms
g.gif
32 ms
g.gif
39 ms
g.gif
40 ms
g.gif
39 ms
g.gif
39 ms
g.gif
38 ms
g.gif
38 ms
g.gif
41 ms
g.gif
40 ms
g.gif
40 ms
g.gif
40 ms
g.gif
41 ms
g.gif
39 ms
g.gif
42 ms
g.gif
42 ms
g.gif
42 ms
g.gif
43 ms
g.gif
42 ms
g.gif
42 ms
g.gif
44 ms
g.gif
44 ms
g.gif
41 ms
g.gif
43 ms
g.gif
34 ms
digitaltextilereview.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
digitaltextilereview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
digitaltextilereview.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digitaltextilereview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Digitaltextilereview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
digitaltextilereview.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Digital Textile Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: