5.1 sec in total
1.2 sec
3.7 sec
232 ms
Visit dimagen.com now to see the best up-to-date DIMAGEN content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about dimagen.com
Especialistas en diseño de marcas y etiquetas de vino y sector alimentario, páginas web y tiendas online. Más de 25 años ayudando a vender.
Visit dimagen.comWe analyzed Dimagen.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
dimagen.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.5 s
0/100
10%
Value9.8 s
0/100
25%
Value17.8 s
0/100
10%
Value1,380 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.263
47/100
15%
Value12.9 s
13/100
10%
1171 ms
203 ms
218 ms
223 ms
231 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (84 requests) were addressed to the original Dimagen.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Dimagen.com.
Page size can be reduced by 855.7 kB (54%)
1.6 MB
718.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Dimagen.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 677.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 131.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 131.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 127.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, DIMAGEN needs image optimization as it can save up to 127.3 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 489.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 489.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 108.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dimagen.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 108.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (50%)
88
44
The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of DIMAGEN. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
dimagen.com
1171 ms
reset.css
203 ms
style.css
218 ms
grid.css
223 ms
prettyPhoto.css
231 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
644 ms
style.css
651 ms
style.css
307 ms
contentflow.css
319 ms
style.css
327 ms
skin.css
342 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
410 ms
style.css
419 ms
style.css
433 ms
style.css
456 ms
style.css
511 ms
video-js.css
521 ms
jquery-latest.js
881 ms
contentflow.js
685 ms
iscroll.js
617 ms
slideinmenu.js
622 ms
flow.jcarousel-1.0.js
720 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
724 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
754 ms
jquery.scrollable.min.js
764 ms
jquery.tinyscrollbar.min.js
796 ms
video.js
825 ms
jquery.cycle.all.latest.js
829 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
870 ms
slidemenu.js
906 ms
superfish.js
910 ms
supersubs.js
927 ms
hoverIntent.js
929 ms
flow.top.navigation-1.0.js
987 ms
animated-portfolio-v2.js
983 ms
animated-portfolio-v6.js
1000 ms
css
25 ms
css
37 ms
browserplus-min.js
5 ms
video-js.css
1245 ms
mousewheel.js
840 ms
cloud-carousel.1.0.5.min.js
820 ms
jquery.tooltip.min.js
883 ms
cufon-yui.js
885 ms
video.js
1181 ms
css
13 ms
css
22 ms
contentflow.css
230 ms
cursor_preloader_white_a.gif
105 ms
DIMAGEN_logo.png
119 ms
header-arrow.png
110 ms
logo.png
104 ms
DBCt-NXN57MTAFjitYxdrDR-eWpsHSw83BRsAQElGgc.ttf
20 ms
2Q-AW1e_taO6pHwMXcXW5w.ttf
27 ms
ga.js
26 ms
image.php
178 ms
image.php
278 ms
image.php
191 ms
image.php
208 ms
image.php
352 ms
image.php
366 ms
image.php
389 ms
image.php
407 ms
image.php
327 ms
image.php
385 ms
image.php
445 ms
image.php
468 ms
image.php
606 ms
image.php
590 ms
image.php
590 ms
image.php
516 ms
image.php
562 ms
image.php
585 ms
image.php
626 ms
image.php
683 ms
image.php
930 ms
image.php
691 ms
image.php
696 ms
image.php
726 ms
image.php
735 ms
image.php
915 ms
image.php
893 ms
image.php
800 ms
image.php
846 ms
image.php
957 ms
image.php
906 ms
image.php
968 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
image.php
933 ms
image.php
942 ms
image.php
962 ms
image.php
965 ms
1px.png
886 ms
dimagen.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
dimagen.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
dimagen.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ES
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dimagen.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Dimagen.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dimagen.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of DIMAGEN. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: