5.3 sec in total
1.2 sec
3.6 sec
567 ms
Visit displaymanager.in now to see the best up-to-date Display Manager content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about displaymanager.in
Display Manager: Manufacturer of Wire Display Products, including alligator stand, broom stand, cage pallet, stall bin and more for storing and displaying items.
Visit displaymanager.inWe analyzed Displaymanager.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
displaymanager.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value28.7 s
0/100
25%
Value15.2 s
1/100
10%
Value4,480 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.521
15/100
15%
Value25.0 s
0/100
10%
1197 ms
272 ms
177 ms
15 ms
33 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Displaymanager.in, 3% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Displaymanager.in.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (20%)
8.2 MB
6.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Displaymanager.in main page is 8.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 195.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 195.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 228.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Display Manager images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 851.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 851.5 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 339.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Displaymanager.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 339.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (66%)
91
31
The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Display Manager. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
displaymanager.in
1197 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
272 ms
front.css
177 ms
font-awesome.min.css
15 ms
css
33 ms
frontend.css
266 ms
styles.css
190 ms
style2-os.css
267 ms
lightbox.css
268 ms
catalog-carousel-style.css
316 ms
font-awesome.css
439 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
372 ms
font-awesome.min.css
440 ms
wplcstyle.css
355 ms
style.css
544 ms
css
28 ms
displaymanager.in
855 ms
jquery.js
625 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
462 ms
wplc_u.js
540 ms
jquery-cookie.js
540 ms
jquery.cycle2.js
724 ms
jquery.cycle2.carousel.js
714 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.js
735 ms
front.js
638 ms
functions.min.js
718 ms
colorbox-1.css
674 ms
addthis_widget.js
15 ms
output.css
594 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
597 ms
animate.css
697 ms
shadows.css
615 ms
animate.css
839 ms
core.min.js
729 ms
widget.min.js
727 ms
mouse.min.js
836 ms
draggable.min.js
727 ms
frontend.js
847 ms
jquery.form.min.js
852 ms
scripts.js
851 ms
jquery.colorbox.js
848 ms
webfont.js
22 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
6 ms
jquery.hugeitmicro.min.js
845 ms
catalog-all.js
858 ms
jquery.elevateZoom-3.0.8.min.js
857 ms
elevateZoomParams.js
956 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
868 ms
slider-settings.min.js
863 ms
wp-embed.min.js
904 ms
jquery.colorbox.min.js
835 ms
gmw.js
818 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
872 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
784 ms
frontend.js
819 ms
frontend.js
738 ms
jquery.lettering.js
755 ms
jquery.textillate.js
758 ms
staticmap
236 ms
background.png
732 ms
Display-Manager1.png
733 ms
4-1000x300.png
931 ms
5-1000x300.png
995 ms
2-1000x300.png
1161 ms
1-1000x300.png
913 ms
4-250x100.png
732 ms
5-250x100.png
734 ms
2-250x100.png
732 ms
1-250x100.png
736 ms
Stall-Bin.jpg
1679 ms
2Q-AW1e_taO6pHwMXcXW5w.ttf
29 ms
Stackable-Basket.jpg
1137 ms
Dump-Bin.jpg
1199 ms
Cage-Pallet.jpg
1132 ms
Genericons.svg
1103 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgjO2i86D6AshzNIwGgBAmQUAAAA=
107 ms
Broom-Stand.jpg
1483 ms
Aligater-Stand.jpg
1327 ms
fb.jpg
1115 ms
tw.jpg
1105 ms
in.jpg
1170 ms
gp.jpg
1194 ms
gmw.css
702 ms
300lo.json
27 ms
ajax-loader.gif
737 ms
overlay.png
741 ms
bx_loader.gif
749 ms
controls.png
796 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
46 ms
layers.e5ea973510bf60b3db41.js
25 ms
fql
130 ms
count.json
27 ms
info.json
78 ms
shares.json
8 ms
displaymanager.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
displaymanager.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
displaymanager.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Displaymanager.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Displaymanager.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
displaymanager.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Display Manager. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: