Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

distancebetween.net

disween.com - Distance Calculator, Distance Between Cities, Airports, Countries

Page Load Speed

209 ms in total

First Response

62 ms

Resources Loaded

66 ms

Page Rendered

81 ms

distancebetween.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Distance Between content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about distancebetween.net

Calculate distances between cities, countries, airports and more. Website to visit before you travel!

Visit distancebetween.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Distancebetween.net page load time and found that the first response time was 62 ms and then it took 147 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

distancebetween.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

distancebetween.net

62 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Distancebetween.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (62 ms) belongs to the original domain Distancebetween.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 298 B (44%)

Content Size

672 B

After Optimization

374 B

In fact, the total size of Distancebetween.net main page is 672 B. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 672 B which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 298 B

  • Original 672 B
  • After minification 668 B
  • After compression 374 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 298 B or 44% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

SEO Factors

distancebetween.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Distancebetween.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Distancebetween.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Distance Between. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: