8.7 sec in total
2.1 sec
3.6 sec
3.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Dotneat content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about dotneat.net
neat things about .net
Visit dotneat.netWe analyzed Dotneat.net page load time and found that the first response time was 2.1 sec and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Dotneat.net rating and web reputation
dotneat.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
24/100
10%
Value4.7 s
33/100
25%
Value4.3 s
76/100
10%
Value400 ms
68/100
30%
Value0.105
89/100
15%
Value4.9 s
78/100
10%
2053 ms
303 ms
299 ms
300 ms
304 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Dotneat.net, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Github.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Dotneat.net.
Page size can be reduced by 525.4 kB (28%)
1.9 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Dotneat.net main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 137.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 137.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 293.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Dotneat needs image optimization as it can save up to 293.4 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 67.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 67.5 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dotneat.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (51%)
87
43
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dotneat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
dotneat.net
2053 ms
the-right-stuff.css
303 ms
page-layout.css
299 ms
admin.css
300 ms
item.css
304 ms
tags.css
296 ms
calendar.css
305 ms
SyntaxHighlighter.css
381 ms
lytebox.css
393 ms
xfn.css
383 ms
websnapr.css
384 ms
shCore.js
190 ms
shBrushBash.js
169 ms
shBrushCpp.js
175 ms
shBrushCSharp.js
178 ms
shBrushCss.js
179 ms
shBrushDelphi.js
258 ms
shBrushDiff.js
248 ms
shBrushGroovy.js
256 ms
shBrushJava.js
263 ms
shBrushJScript.js
264 ms
shBrushPhp.js
273 ms
shBrushPlain.js
327 ms
shBrushPython.js
341 ms
shBrushRuby.js
345 ms
shBrushPerl.js
343 ms
shBrushScala.js
343 ms
shBrushSql.js
358 ms
shBrushVb.js
416 ms
shBrushXml.js
429 ms
websnapr.js
241 ms
xfn-highlighter.js
242 ms
open-link.js
351 ms
lytebox.js
427 ms
urchin.js
5 ms
button1-addthis.gif
73 ms
home01.png
136 ms
dropboxkeepass2.png
66 ms
ir
67 ms
background.gif
138 ms
header-background.png
142 ms
dGallery-mvc.png
598 ms
invoicing_app_tags.png
260 ms
errors01.png
267 ms
errors02.png
218 ms
errors03.png
224 ms
errors12.png
225 ms
errors04.png
303 ms
errors07.png
388 ms
errors05.png
308 ms
errors06.png
422 ms
errors08.png
438 ms
errors09.png
468 ms
errors10.png
390 ms
errors11.png
472 ms
errors13.png
474 ms
errors14.png
506 ms
happy.gif
523 ms
dropboxversiones.png
639 ms
visualsvnserver.png
718 ms
repositoriosvnendropbox.png
797 ms
archivohosts.png
673 ms
svncheckout.png
605 ms
serializationScreen1small.png
680 ms
serializationScreenReviewsmall.png
692 ms
backgroundworker.png
724 ms
PublishWeb.png
758 ms
PublishWeb3.png
771 ms
PublishWeb2.png
778 ms
ToolStripCustomHost1.png
798 ms
ToolStripCustomHost2.png
806 ms
author.jpg
841 ms
vitaminasdev.gif
857 ms
dropboxkeepass2.png
143 ms
88x31.png
80 ms
51EjywaM7NL._SL110_.jpg
77 ms
feed-button-12x12.gif
804 ms
btn_liprofile_blue_80x15.gif
81 ms
home01.png
40 ms
__utm.gif
7 ms
feed-button-32x32.gif
769 ms
outlinedown.gif
762 ms
outlinearrow.gif
774 ms
home01.png
87 ms
websnapr.css
724 ms
item.gif
727 ms
categories.gif
729 ms
list-image.gif
731 ms
item-footer-left.gif
724 ms
item-footer-middle.gif
690 ms
comment-icon.gif
713 ms
permalink.gif
653 ms
timeline.gif
646 ms
footer-background.png
639 ms
controls-administration.gif
632 ms
sign-in.gif
613 ms
print.css
88 ms
dotneat.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
dotneat.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
dotneat.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dotneat.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Dotneat.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dotneat.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dotneat. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: