1.6 sec in total
106 ms
1.3 sec
239 ms
Click here to check amazing Duplicate Photo Cleaner content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about duplicatephotocleaner.com
With this duplicate photo finder you will be able to find duplicate photos and similar images by comparing actual image content.
Visit duplicatephotocleaner.comWe analyzed Duplicatephotocleaner.com page load time and found that the first response time was 106 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
duplicatephotocleaner.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.7 s
93/100
10%
Value2.3 s
93/100
25%
Value2.0 s
99/100
10%
Value150 ms
94/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.0 s
76/100
10%
106 ms
236 ms
55 ms
87 ms
114 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Duplicatephotocleaner.com, 13% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (431 ms) belongs to the original domain Duplicatephotocleaner.com.
Page size can be reduced by 446.2 kB (21%)
2.1 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Duplicatephotocleaner.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.1 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 96.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Duplicate Photo Cleaner images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 301.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 301.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Duplicatephotocleaner.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 29.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (42%)
50
29
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Duplicate Photo Cleaner. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
duplicatephotocleaner.com
106 ms
www.duplicatephotocleaner.com
236 ms
reset.css
55 ms
jSlider.css
87 ms
screen.css
114 ms
responsive.css
92 ms
logo.png
85 ms
slide01.jpg
210 ms
slide02.jpg
209 ms
slide03.jpg
258 ms
slide04.jpg
301 ms
slide05.jpg
300 ms
slide06.jpg
207 ms
conversion.js
18 ms
jquery-latest.js
375 ms
jquery.lightbox-0.5.js
237 ms
jquery.plugin.js
237 ms
jquery.slides.js
282 ms
site.js
281 ms
plusone.js
91 ms
widgets.js
90 ms
all.js
187 ms
54 ms
8668-lg.gif
225 ms
shade.png
168 ms
home_visual.jpg
237 ms
screen6_mac.png
399 ms
screen2_mac.png
410 ms
screen3_mac.png
431 ms
tip.png
215 ms
logo_footer.png
239 ms
102 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
15 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
37 ms
fastbutton
90 ms
ol-web.woff
204 ms
postmessageRelay
69 ms
168 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
22 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
24 ms
xd_arbiter.php
292 ms
xd_arbiter.php
297 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
138 ms
api.js
99 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
107 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
114 ms
ga.js
60 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
153 ms
ping
97 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
like.php
96 ms
tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html
46 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
298 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
334 ms
jot
89 ms
duplicatephotocleaner.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
duplicatephotocleaner.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
duplicatephotocleaner.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Duplicatephotocleaner.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Duplicatephotocleaner.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
duplicatephotocleaner.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Duplicate Photo Cleaner. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: