3.3 sec in total
303 ms
2.9 sec
163 ms
Click here to check amazing Forum Doc Check content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about forum.doccheck.com
DocCheck
Visit forum.doccheck.comWe analyzed Forum.doccheck.com page load time and found that the first response time was 303 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
forum.doccheck.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.8 s
0/100
10%
Value14.9 s
0/100
25%
Value13.9 s
1/100
10%
Value3,160 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.079
94/100
15%
Value17.7 s
4/100
10%
303 ms
1319 ms
214 ms
388 ms
210 ms
Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Forum.doccheck.com, 63% (15 requests) were made to Dccdn.de and 13% (3 requests) were made to Info.doccheck.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Info.doccheck.com.
Page size can be reduced by 371.5 kB (68%)
543.5 kB
172.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Forum.doccheck.com main page is 543.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 315.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.1 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Forum Doc Check images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 214.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 214.4 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 143.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Forum.doccheck.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 143.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (40%)
20
12
The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Forum Doc Check. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
forum.doccheck.com
303 ms
1319 ms
stylesheet_5d370599a3.css
214 ms
min.v15.08.css
388 ms
main.cms.css
210 ms
min.v15.08.js
679 ms
font-awesome.3.2.1.min.css
289 ms
min.v15.08.header.css
205 ms
min.v15.08.header.js
205 ms
iam.js
416 ms
dc_header.gif
194 ms
dc_header.png
100 ms
doccheck.png
98 ms
fontawesome-webfont-3.2.1.woff
392 ms
breadcrumb_arrow.gif
99 ms
arrow_right_red.png
186 ms
icon_new_de.gif
195 ms
ajs.php
202 ms
79b77c5b0a461f80c83cd04b661fa45d.jpg
311 ms
bg_footer.gif
100 ms
lg.php
105 ms
tx.io
189 ms
tx.io
95 ms
loader_grey_small.gif
100 ms
forum.doccheck.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
forum.doccheck.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
forum.doccheck.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Forum.doccheck.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is German. Our system also found out that Forum.doccheck.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
forum.doccheck.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Forum Doc Check. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: