2.8 sec in total
625 ms
1.9 sec
228 ms
Visit earea.de now to see the best up-to-date Earea content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about earea.de
2 GB SSD Webspace inkl. .de Domain ab 1,95 €* Web E-Mail, Web FTP, Web MySQL. Alle Pakete inkl. der komfortablen Benutzeroberfläche LiveConfig
Visit earea.deWe analyzed Earea.de page load time and found that the first response time was 625 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
earea.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.7 s
0/100
10%
Value10.4 s
0/100
25%
Value13.9 s
1/100
10%
Value610 ms
49/100
30%
Value0.104
89/100
15%
Value14.3 s
9/100
10%
625 ms
427 ms
242 ms
333 ms
242 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Earea.de, 5% (2 requests) were made to Info.template-help.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (985 ms) belongs to the original domain Earea.de.
Page size can be reduced by 159.5 kB (24%)
667.5 kB
508.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Earea.de main page is 667.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 469.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Earea images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 79.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 79.2 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Earea.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (57%)
37
16
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Earea. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
earea.de
625 ms
jquery-1.3.2.min.js
427 ms
tabs.js
242 ms
cufon-yui.js
333 ms
cufon-replace.js
242 ms
Swis721_Hv_BT_400.font.js
327 ms
Swis721_Th_BT_400.font.js
339 ms
Swis721_Lt_BT_400.font.js
382 ms
ie6_script_other.js
13 ms
constant.css
368 ms
template.css
504 ms
ie6_script_other.js
4 ms
EUCookieDirective.js
350 ms
logo.png
985 ms
tab_pic.jpg
137 ms
pic1.jpg
237 ms
all_bg.gif
221 ms
top_bg.png
115 ms
menu_bg_left.png
132 ms
menu_bg_right.png
140 ms
dd_menu_bottom.png
220 ms
cont_top_bg.png
242 ms
cont_bg.png
243 ms
girl_right.jpg
446 ms
block_bg.gif
322 ms
details_button.gif
325 ms
details_bgs1.png
374 ms
box_red_bg.gif
449 ms
details_button_red.gif
424 ms
marker_list.gif
439 ms
bgs1.gif
483 ms
bgs5.gif
527 ms
bgs2.gif
544 ms
bgs3.gif
545 ms
bgs4.gif
550 ms
bgs6.gif
591 ms
cont_bg_bottom.png
643 ms
details_bgs3.png
652 ms
continue_button.png
659 ms
earea.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
earea.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
earea.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Earea.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Earea.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
earea.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Earea. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: