Tools & Wizards About Us
ecmascript.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

ecmascript.org

ECMAScript

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

192 ms

Resources Loaded

939 ms

Page Rendered

99 ms

ecmascript.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing ECMAScript content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ecmascript.org

Home of the ECMAScript programming language.

Visit ecmascript.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Ecmascript.org page load time and found that the first response time was 192 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ecmascript.org performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

ecmascript.org

192 ms

www.ecmascript.org

178 ms

refresh.css

242 ms

es.css

166 ms

urchin.js

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Ecmascript.org, 17% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (320 ms) belongs to the original domain Ecmascript.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 9.2 kB (25%)

Content Size

36.5 kB

After Optimization

27.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ecmascript.org main page is 36.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 19.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 2.7 kB
  • After minification 2.7 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.6 kB or 58% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 19.7 kB
  • After minification 18.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ECMAScript images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 971 B

  • Original 6.8 kB
  • After minification 6.8 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 971 B or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 5.6 kB

  • Original 7.3 kB
  • After minification 5.1 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ecmascript.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ECMAScript. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

ecmascript.org

ecmascript.org

192 ms

www.ecmascript.org

www.ecmascript.org

178 ms

refresh.css

refresh.css

242 ms

es.css

es.css

166 ms

urchin.js

urchin.js

21 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

21 ms

content.jpg

content.jpg

163 ms

header.jpg

header.jpg

320 ms

menu.jpg

menu.jpg

162 ms

square-green.png

square-green.png

164 ms

news.png

news.png

243 ms

footer.jpg

footer.jpg

166 ms

SEO Factors

ecmascript.org SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ecmascript.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ecmascript.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

ecmascript.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ECMAScript. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: