Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

ecreditcardcomparison.com

Credit Card Comparison - e credit card comparison

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

495 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

505 ms

ecreditcardcomparison.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing E Credit Card Comparison content for Malaysia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ecreditcardcomparison.com

  How To Do A Credit Card ComparisonCredit Card Comparison Table1 How To Do A Credit Card Comparison2 Finding The Best Credit Card Offer3 Credit Card Comparison Tips4 Credit Card For Bad Credit5 Credi...

Visit ecreditcardcomparison.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ecreditcardcomparison.com page load time and found that the first response time was 495 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ecreditcardcomparison.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

ecreditcardcomparison.com

495 ms

style.css

129 ms

css

25 ms

styles.css

84 ms

screen.min.css

88 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Ecreditcardcomparison.com, 11% (6 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 9% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (495 ms) belongs to the original domain Ecreditcardcomparison.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 678.9 kB (62%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

412.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Ecreditcardcomparison.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 528.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 30.5 kB

  • Original 41.8 kB
  • After minification 40.6 kB
  • After compression 11.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.5 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 119.2 kB
  • After minification 117.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. E Credit Card Comparison images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 311.3 kB

  • Original 528.0 kB
  • After minification 522.3 kB
  • After compression 216.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 311.3 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 335.3 kB

  • Original 402.3 kB
  • After minification 384.7 kB
  • After compression 67.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ecreditcardcomparison.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 335.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (59%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

20

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E Credit Card Comparison. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

ecreditcardcomparison.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ecreditcardcomparison.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ecreditcardcomparison.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of E Credit Card Comparison. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: