8 sec in total
288 ms
7.4 sec
258 ms
Click here to check amazing Editafacil content for Ecuador. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about editafacil.es
Visit editafacil.esWe analyzed Editafacil.es page load time and found that the first response time was 288 ms and then it took 7.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
editafacil.es performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
67/100
10%
Value2.9 s
80/100
25%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
Value110 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value3.3 s
94/100
10%
288 ms
302 ms
2653 ms
614 ms
193 ms
Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Editafacil.es, 83% (87 requests) were made to Editafacil.us and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) relates to the external source Editafacil.us.
Page size can be reduced by 920.6 kB (35%)
2.7 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Editafacil.es main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 196.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Editafacil needs image optimization as it can save up to 196.4 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 519.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 519.8 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 166.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Editafacil.es needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 166.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (52%)
96
46
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Editafacil. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
editafacil.es
288 ms
www.editafacil.es
302 ms
inicio_895_1_ap.html
2653 ms
prototype.js
614 ms
scriptaculous.js
193 ms
carousel.js
355 ms
verflash.js
343 ms
areaprivada.js
354 ms
tiny_mce.js
765 ms
esencia_personalizado.js
380 ms
funciones_editafacil.js
624 ms
jquery.js
18 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
462 ms
jquery-ui.js
20 ms
jquery-ui.css
16 ms
ui.datepicker-es.js
364 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
473 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
461 ms
jquery.ui.selectmenu.css
553 ms
jquery.ui.selectmenu.js
641 ms
1.5.js
568 ms
slick.min.js
626 ms
jquery.form.js
50 ms
esencia-load.js
650 ms
plusone.js
62 ms
css
32 ms
css
46 ms
prettyPhoto.css
653 ms
estilos.css
938 ms
estilos.asp
704 ms
cabecera.js
729 ms
jquery.form.js
61 ms
jsmenu.js
580 ms
antispam.js
547 ms
effects.js
265 ms
editor_template.js
111 ms
es.js
126 ms
editor_ui.css
128 ms
editor_plugin.js
138 ms
editor_plugin.js
143 ms
editor_plugin.js
200 ms
editor_plugin.js
219 ms
editor_plugin.js
217 ms
editor_plugin.js
220 ms
editor_plugin.js
231 ms
es.js
129 ms
es.js
87 ms
es.js
87 ms
es.js
87 ms
es.js
87 ms
es.js
120 ms
es.js
87 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
11 ms
estilosprint.css
90 ms
logotipo.png
144 ms
ico_contacto.png
141 ms
btn_menu_lat.png
138 ms
btn_menu_lat_desp.png
135 ms
imagen.asp
389 ms
imagen.asp
320 ms
imagen.asp
489 ms
imagen.asp
450 ms
imagen.asp
609 ms
imagen.asp
631 ms
imagen.asp
670 ms
imagen.asp
631 ms
imagen.asp
770 ms
ico_facebook.png
586 ms
ico_twitter.png
693 ms
ico_google.png
694 ms
ico_youtube.png
721 ms
ico_linkedin.png
723 ms
btn_help.png
755 ms
btn_gratis_editor.png
780 ms
globo_gratis_editor.png
793 ms
descarga_publi.png
898 ms
imagen.asp
897 ms
img_verdetalles.png
899 ms
imagen.asp
1066 ms
imagen.asp
1309 ms
imagen.asp
1231 ms
imagen.asp
1233 ms
imagen.asp
1236 ms
imagen.asp
1234 ms
imagen.asp
1576 ms
imagen.asp
1577 ms
imagen.asp
1578 ms
imagen.asp
1583 ms
imagen.asp
1582 ms
dc.js
33 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
10 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMw1o1eFRj7wYC6JbISqOjY.ttf
17 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGEMbjGELOEJD5J8DUmxkO-A.ttf
20 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf
18 ms
inpage_linkid.js
10 ms
Helvetica-Light.woff
1509 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
imagen.asp
1529 ms
ic_menu_hover.png
1531 ms
fnd_menulat_dcho.png
1529 ms
mascara_ver.png
1539 ms
flecha_select.png
1354 ms
flecha_ant.png
1295 ms
flecha_sgte.png
1298 ms
ajax-loader.gif
1272 ms
editafacil.es accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
editafacil.es best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
editafacil.es SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Editafacil.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Editafacil.es main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
editafacil.es
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Editafacil. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: