6.9 sec in total
2.8 sec
4 sec
137 ms
Welcome to editorial-mm.com homepage info - get ready to check Editorial Mm best content right away, or after learning these important things about editorial-mm.com
Visit editorial-mm.comWe analyzed Editorial-mm.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.8 sec and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
editorial-mm.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.8 s
4/100
10%
Value85.3 s
0/100
25%
Value9.8 s
10/100
10%
Value1,050 ms
25/100
30%
Value0.215
58/100
15%
Value10.6 s
23/100
10%
2780 ms
197 ms
302 ms
325 ms
315 ms
Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Editorial-mm.com, 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Editorial-mm.com.
Page size can be reduced by 182.0 kB (61%)
300.6 kB
118.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Editorial-mm.com main page is 300.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 159.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.8 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.1 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 383 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Editorial Mm images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 105.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 105.3 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 65.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Editorial-mm.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 65.3 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (59%)
22
9
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Editorial Mm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
editorial-mm.com
2780 ms
screen.css
197 ms
style.css
302 ms
styles.css
325 ms
style.css
315 ms
jquery.js
431 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
343 ms
slides.min.jquery.js
384 ms
superfish-combined.js
488 ms
script.js
500 ms
d2edfbe0ce4030a244f8a65148035692.css
527 ms
css
72 ms
jquery.form.min.js
550 ms
scripts.js
574 ms
9ebfb36aef112236858111f72c3e8010.js
896 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
378 ms
logo.png
204 ms
1506010_10153892266110001_1697001145_n.jpg
440 ms
61875_10153879048080001_1706554527_n.jpg
496 ms
rounded-dark.png
241 ms
rounded-dark.png
691 ms
hr.gif
407 ms
fontello.woff
431 ms
editorial-mm.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
editorial-mm.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
editorial-mm.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Editorial-mm.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Editorial-mm.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
editorial-mm.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Editorial Mm. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: