1.3 sec in total
112 ms
962 ms
219 ms
Welcome to editspot.com homepage info - get ready to check Editspot best content right away, or after learning these important things about editspot.com
editspot.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, editspot.com has it all. We hope you find w...
Visit editspot.comWe analyzed Editspot.com page load time and found that the first response time was 112 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
editspot.com performance score
112 ms
98 ms
62 ms
48 ms
119 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Editspot.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to W.sharethis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to T.sharethis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (456 ms) belongs to the original domain Editspot.com.
Page size can be reduced by 342.0 kB (62%)
549.5 kB
207.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Editspot.com main page is 549.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 405.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 7.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.2 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.8 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 187 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Editspot images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 318.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 318.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Editspot.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (58%)
57
24
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Editspot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
editspot.com
112 ms
calendar.js
98 ms
calendar-en.js
62 ms
calendar-setup.js
48 ms
jquery-1.2.6.min.js
119 ms
hoverIntent.js
53 ms
superfish.js
55 ms
calendar.css
105 ms
sharethis.js
8 ms
prototype.js
199 ms
scriptaculous.js
102 ms
lightbox.js
132 ms
lightbox.css
148 ms
themedefault.css
151 ms
sharethis.1ac33bc7d4476110a610f925104446ff.css
3 ms
effects.js
74 ms
builder.js
57 ms
bg.gif
87 ms
content-bg.png
90 ms
flash-border.gif
89 ms
flash.jpg
298 ms
main-border.gif
89 ms
main-bottom.gif
93 ms
main-bottom-bg.gif
137 ms
spotlets.jpg
126 ms
free.jpg
133 ms
free-separator.gif
130 ms
webspot.jpg
176 ms
button-webspot.jpg
235 ms
webspot-separator.gif
234 ms
sidebar-bottom-bg.gif
235 ms
sidebar-top.gif
329 ms
sidebar-bottom.gif
295 ms
sidebar-img1.jpg
351 ms
sidebar-img2.jpg
372 ms
header-bg.gif
366 ms
tab.gif
340 ms
search.gif
356 ms
getSegment.php
151 ms
nav-sub-separator.gif
304 ms
logo.gif
309 ms
nav-coner.gif
327 ms
nav-separator.gif
313 ms
nav-bg.gif
315 ms
drop-down-bg.png
320 ms
drop-down-line.gif
331 ms
footer-bg.gif
344 ms
loading.gif
433 ms
closelabel.gif
456 ms
t.dhj
12 ms
t.dhj
15 ms
cm
21 ms
s-3271.xgi
5 ms
hbpix
24 ms
4 ms
7 ms
xrefid.xgi
7 ms
pixel
14 ms
pixel
14 ms
2981
34 ms
editspot.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Editspot.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Editspot.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
editspot.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Editspot. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: