50.5 sec in total
1.9 sec
48.3 sec
328 ms
Welcome to ee9.us homepage info - get ready to check Ee 9 best content right away, or after learning these important things about ee9.us
百度一下 你就知道
Visit ee9.usWe analyzed Ee9.us page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 48.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 2 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
ee9.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
14/100
10%
Value5.2 s
23/100
25%
Value5.5 s
54/100
10%
Value470 ms
60/100
30%
Value0.267
46/100
15%
Value5.1 s
76/100
10%
1920 ms
1806 ms
1824 ms
4292 ms
458 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Ee9.us, 13% (13 requests) were made to Pos.baidu.com and 13% (13 requests) were made to T12.baidu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.3 sec) relates to the external source Wn.x.jd.com.
Page size can be reduced by 420.9 kB (20%)
2.1 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Ee9.us main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ee 9 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 393.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 393.1 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ee9.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.8 kB or 68% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (31%)
94
65
The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ee 9. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
864.dragonparking.com
1920 ms
oneclick.css
1806 ms
client2.js
1824 ms
track.js
4292 ms
dp.js
458 ms
ci.js
759 ms
c.js
1038 ms
f.js
1081 ms
f.js
2085 ms
biz2.jpg
6388 ms
kchm
1248 ms
kchm
1357 ms
kchm
1550 ms
uijs.php
3280 ms
uijs.php
703 ms
kchm
1316 ms
uijs.php
3312 ms
kchm
1308 ms
kchm
1550 ms
ls.js
1071 ms
bg.png
457 ms
cpro.js
722 ms
icon_14px.png
512 ms
ls_flowbar.js
1379 ms
kchm
1432 ms
kchm
2111 ms
kchm
1320 ms
kchm
2430 ms
kchm
4414 ms
kchm
880 ms
xuanfu_close.png
484 ms
adx.php
887 ms
adx.php
764 ms
adPic.new.20150909.min.js
62 ms
bot-patch.min.js
67 ms
click.min.js
67 ms
home
883 ms
rBEhWlJYrAEIAAAAAAACetYAYQwAAECuwP__W4AAAKS951.png
67 ms
56f3850fN397398ef.jpg
54 ms
baidu
20335 ms
adx.php
745 ms
adx.php
697 ms
u=1364289134,2040624832&fm=76
1768 ms
u=4155964195,4137118752&fm=76
1783 ms
u=492649758,4136142410&fm=76
4104 ms
bg.png
281 ms
u=1998651417,2750102850&fm=76
2204 ms
u=1677035887,1256771927&fm=76
2788 ms
u=1852566170,2737401943&fm=76
10037 ms
u=774463136,1470160893&fm=76
8924 ms
adx.php
758 ms
reduce_bd-logo1_oper.png
557 ms
u=1735644204,2113704943&fm=76
4590 ms
u=330237801,671513383&fm=76
4571 ms
u=1951238896,2659867143&fm=76
8438 ms
u=1554830338,2146536866&fm=76
4287 ms
u=1683668816,1216567831&fm=76
3176 ms
u=3099914519,3438159371&fm=76
1449 ms
u=938624696,1088364505&fm=76
5809 ms
u=1926957962,2533629919&fm=76
3802 ms
jquery_a4373ccd.js
5426 ms
sync.htm
251 ms
adx.php
369 ms
u=1840268154,2078706384&fm=76
5438 ms
u=1157015424,1225506217&fm=76
9004 ms
u=1780866766,2553076054&fm=76
5623 ms
u=1378038637,1917658524&fm=76
7693 ms
u=3606824593,129541439&fm=76
3545 ms
u=3631708702,3929097240&fm=76
3376 ms
u=852391891,1035378621&fm=76
16964 ms
u=1004536040,1235717463&fm=76
6776 ms
sync.htm
360 ms
u=1887438195,2929156278&fm=76
5633 ms
u=3059151468,3543266969&fm=76
7696 ms
u=145813425,707644692&fm=76
20104 ms
u=3970680618,4045378381&fm=76
4708 ms
u=1496671384,950133907&fm=76
8287 ms
u=1484235901,1765105298&fm=76
7681 ms
u=1182063673,1474605711&fm=76
9478 ms
u=1535638883,1968033168&fm=76
8788 ms
u=1821434000,2583019160&fm=76
6178 ms
u=1282722014,1552229938&fm=76
10381 ms
u=1878449901,2206410452&fm=76
7566 ms
u=1353996872,1781456964&fm=76
8038 ms
u=1349999639,1904041719&fm=76
14222 ms
arrow_left_60_e700a3bb.png
1285 ms
arrow_left_50_1dfda915.png
2746 ms
closefeedback.min.js
545 ms
reduce_promotion_oper.png
502 ms
bd_logo.png
503 ms
bg_rb.png
529 ms
55e40d3fN2a01189f.png
82 ms
1.gif
592 ms
o.htm
1591 ms
ac.js
486 ms
wh.js
770 ms
fp.htm
551 ms
ee9.us accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
ee9.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
ee9.us SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ee9.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Ee9.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ee9.us
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ee 9. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: