7.5 sec in total
228 ms
6.2 sec
1.1 sec
Welcome to efabless.com homepage info - get ready to check Efabless best content for Japan right away, or after learning these important things about efabless.com
Chip Creation Made Simple
Visit efabless.comWe analyzed Efabless.com page load time and found that the first response time was 228 ms and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
efabless.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
79/100
10%
Value3.7 s
58/100
25%
Value2.2 s
99/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value3.1 s
95/100
10%
228 ms
893 ms
29 ms
278 ms
226 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Efabless.com, 21% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Efabless.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (37%)
5.4 MB
3.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Efabless.com main page is 5.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 651.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Efabless needs image optimization as it can save up to 651.7 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 305.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 305.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 988.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Efabless.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 988.3 kB or 91% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (62%)
52
20
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Efabless. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
efabless.com
228 ms
www.efabless.com
893 ms
analytics.js
29 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
278 ms
wp-notification-bars-public.css
226 ms
styles.css
238 ms
css
73 ms
css
88 ms
bootstrap.willow.min.css
559 ms
font-awesome.min.css
338 ms
linecons.css
347 ms
animate.css
569 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
553 ms
magnific-popup.willow.css
492 ms
style.css
739 ms
collect
18 ms
style.css
526 ms
js_composer.css
1708 ms
jquery.js
1022 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
725 ms
wp-notification-bars-public.js
756 ms
waypoints.min.js
760 ms
hoverintent.js
912 ms
superfish.js
942 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1057 ms
smoothscroll.min.js
1000 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1378 ms
jquery.fittext.js
1141 ms
script.js
1318 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1170 ms
scripts.js
1187 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1274 ms
jquery.parallax.min.js
1387 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
1431 ms
jquery.touchswipe.min.js
1462 ms
jquery.caroufredsel-packed.js
1865 ms
js_composer_front.js
1592 ms
efabless.com_.transparent-7.s21.png
84 ms
shutterstock_149924543-1.jpg
1759 ms
sliderbg_img.png
1610 ms
shutterstock_126735548-22-copy-4-1.png
1948 ms
efabless.labs_.1-450x304.png
989 ms
design_chip.png
1005 ms
shutterstock_79874698-tr-copy-450x304.png
1545 ms
2013-12-07_19-31-53_01-450x304.png
1561 ms
efabless_005.png
1828 ms
mw.png
1993 ms
mk.png
2044 ms
jh.png
2056 ms
rs.png
2189 ms
ll.png
2197 ms
bi-1.jpg
2255 ms
efabless.com_.transparent-7.s2.png
2231 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
633 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
653 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
652 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
652 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
651 ms
1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
651 ms
PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
651 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
708 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
709 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
708 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
708 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
707 ms
8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-ky3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
707 ms
RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
708 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2410 ms
efabless.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
efabless.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
efabless.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Efabless.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Efabless.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
efabless.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Efabless. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: