2.9 sec in total
204 ms
2.3 sec
371 ms
Welcome to efactor.com homepage info - get ready to check EFACTOR best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about efactor.com
efactor, efactor.com brandable domain name for sale
Visit efactor.comWe analyzed Efactor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 204 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
efactor.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
65/100
10%
Value3.6 s
60/100
25%
Value2.9 s
95/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value4.6 s
81/100
10%
204 ms
360 ms
26 ms
7 ms
8 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Efactor.com, 12% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Efactor.com.
Page size can be reduced by 774.1 kB (30%)
2.6 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Efactor.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.9 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.7 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 97.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EFACTOR images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 293.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 293.1 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 336.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Efactor.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 336.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (36%)
36
23
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EFACTOR. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.efactor.com
204 ms
3138651078.js
360 ms
css
26 ms
font-awesome.min.css
7 ms
bootstrap.min.css
8 ms
home.css
49 ms
jquery.min.js
31 ms
bootstrap.min.js
8 ms
utility.1444930096.js
48 ms
detect_timezone.1309990925.js
51 ms
event
42 ms
efactor-horizontal.png
131 ms
1.jpg
104 ms
2.jpg
105 ms
3.jpg
85 ms
america-foy.jpg
104 ms
craig-tucker.jpg
103 ms
andy-krasfur-new.jpg
636 ms
mark-tigchelaar.jpg
140 ms
anne-roos-born.jpg
140 ms
alfred-remmits.jpg
166 ms
lisette-buckley.jpg
839 ms
richie-kock.jpg
301 ms
alexander-galarraga.jpg
197 ms
graig-weich.jpg
1579 ms
helena-van-der-merwe.jpg
225 ms
stephen-barr.jpg
247 ms
bjschone.jpg
255 ms
welcome-efactor-left.jpg
289 ms
desk.jpg
444 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
43 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGEMbjGELOEJD5J8DUmxkO-A.ttf
61 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf
68 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
17 ms
7JrTVXWoTxk
123 ms
www-embed-player-vflZsBgOl.css
61 ms
www-embed-player.js
84 ms
base.js
157 ms
6BOEML_YqI6cKINK5dmh8ZufcXg7sBa4jeB-I9gQ0xI.js
39 ms
ad_status.js
44 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
87 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
95 ms
nr-686.min.js
16 ms
efactor.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
efactor.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
efactor.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Efactor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Efactor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
efactor.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of EFACTOR. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: