3 sec in total
300 ms
2 sec
660 ms
Click here to check amazing Effect content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about effect.digital
Look no further! You’ve found the award winning, creative and innovative digital agency that delivers results.
Visit effect.digitalWe analyzed Effect.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 300 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
effect.digital performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.7 s
100/100
10%
Value0.7 s
100/100
25%
Value1.7 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value0.7 s
100/100
10%
300 ms
417 ms
111 ms
144 ms
165 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Effect.digital, 82% (54 requests) were made to Effectdigital.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (916 ms) relates to the external source Effectdigital.com.
Page size can be reduced by 279.7 kB (19%)
1.4 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Effect.digital main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.7 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Effect images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 175.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 175.3 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Effect.digital needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 37.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (44%)
63
35
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Effect. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
effect.digital
300 ms
www.effectdigital.com
417 ms
style.css
111 ms
vsv1war.js
144 ms
modernizr-2.6.2-respond-1.1.0.min.js
165 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
200 ms
fontello.css
199 ms
main.min.css
200 ms
jquery.js
257 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
202 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.js
254 ms
front.js
255 ms
afterresize.min.js
254 ms
jquery.hoverdir.min.js
255 ms
jquery.responsiveslides.js
340 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
343 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
345 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
345 ms
main.min.js
347 ms
home.min.js
348 ms
wp-embed.min.js
389 ms
22804.js
93 ms
p.gif
196 ms
dc.js
32 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
254 ms
__utm.gif
90 ms
qzgng4Qz_normal.png
68 ms
pattern.jpg
176 ms
burger.png
177 ms
1418now.jpg
561 ms
1418now_m.jpg
381 ms
red_tractor.jpg
462 ms
edenhall.jpg
463 ms
panache_ss16.jpg
477 ms
rafa-image.jpg
487 ms
lightsout.jpg
552 ms
mycam_aw15.jpg
628 ms
bga.jpg
715 ms
goodyear-image-3.jpg
639 ms
featured_panacherrm.jpg
672 ms
panache-443x295.png
642 ms
effectdigitalsquare-443x295.jpg
648 ms
sdk.js
87 ms
pattern-top.jpg
699 ms
logo.svg
709 ms
plan.svg
713 ms
design.svg
717 ms
develop.svg
741 ms
engage.svg
780 ms
goodyear.svg
782 ms
panache.svg
790 ms
1418now.svg
793 ms
paypal.svg
797 ms
rafa.svg
822 ms
redtractor.svg
861 ms
eden.svg
868 ms
gliding.svg
823 ms
wem.svg
824 ms
twitter.svg
827 ms
google.svg
849 ms
linkedin.svg
889 ms
fontello.woff
916 ms
178 ms
xd_arbiter.php
181 ms
xd_arbiter.php
236 ms
nr-885.min.js
26 ms
effect.digital accessibility score
effect.digital best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
effect.digital SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Effect.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Effect.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
effect.digital
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Effect. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: