2.3 sec in total
92 ms
1.8 sec
373 ms
Visit efficiency365.com now to see the best up-to-date Efficiency 365 content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about efficiency365.com
Efficiency 365 - Get more done with less effort. Learn from the Efficiency Guru, Dr Nitin Paranjape. Work Smarter.
Visit efficiency365.comWe analyzed Efficiency365.com page load time and found that the first response time was 92 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
efficiency365.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value4.6 s
35/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value670 ms
45/100
30%
Value1.089
2/100
15%
Value7.6 s
47/100
10%
92 ms
428 ms
99 ms
105 ms
130 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Efficiency365.com, 13% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Secure.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 534.0 kB (47%)
1.1 MB
604.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Efficiency365.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 443.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.7 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Efficiency 365 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 303.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 303.2 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 165.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Efficiency365.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 165.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (67%)
42
14
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Efficiency 365. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
efficiency365.com
92 ms
efficiency365.com
428 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
99 ms
twentyfourteen.css
105 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
130 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
107 ms
css
72 ms
genericons.css
133 ms
style.css
190 ms
style.css
127 ms
twentyfourteen.css
135 ms
jetpack.css
198 ms
jquery.js
212 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
162 ms
spin.js
163 ms
jquery.spin.js
165 ms
infinity.js
245 ms
jquery.cycle.js
248 ms
slideshow-shortcode.js
169 ms
photon.js
245 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
38 ms
jetpack-carousel.js
246 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
302 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
243 ms
gprofiles.js
171 ms
wpgroho.js
244 ms
functions.js
243 ms
wp-embed.min.js
279 ms
e-201613.js
36 ms
image-21.png
1085 ms
image-18.png
346 ms
image-19.png
479 ms
image-16.png
897 ms
image-11.png
555 ms
image-15.png
464 ms
cropped-Channel-art-V2.png
431 ms
Remove-duplicates-QR.png
93 ms
image-17.png
782 ms
1bHRUMxmJHoup12DnI9XmQ.woff
231 ms
kU6VHbqMAZhaN_nXCmLQsQ.woff
282 ms
I1Pn3gihk5vyP0Yw5GqKsQ.woff
301 ms
7DI7Kjvwfuz8m3ExKe6m-Q.woff
298 ms
Genericons.svg
219 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
18 ms
G-cgiyv4b0HVLV2M8HoP9A.woff
300 ms
XNVd6tsqi9wmKNvnh5HNED8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
300 ms
AcvTq8Q0lyKKNxRlL28Rnz8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
297 ms
ga.js
211 ms
hovercard.css
84 ms
services.css
110 ms
g.gif
81 ms
__utm.gif
46 ms
collect
50 ms
efficiency365.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
efficiency365.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
efficiency365.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Efficiency365.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Efficiency365.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
efficiency365.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Efficiency 365. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: