5.8 sec in total
1.4 sec
4.3 sec
204 ms
Visit egar.eu now to see the best up-to-date Egar content for Slovakia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about egar.eu
Nábytok na sedenie za výborné ceny. Dizajnové sedačky ✅ Pohodlné kreslá ✅ Sedacie Vaky ✅ Pohovky. Výhodný nákup.
Visit egar.euWe analyzed Egar.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
egar.eu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
24/100
10%
Value4.0 s
51/100
25%
Value6.6 s
38/100
10%
Value1,250 ms
19/100
30%
Value0.04
99/100
15%
Value6.9 s
54/100
10%
1364 ms
353 ms
237 ms
239 ms
594 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Egar.eu, 4% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Egar.eu.
Page size can be reduced by 275.4 kB (67%)
414.0 kB
138.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Egar.eu main page is 414.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 274.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 242.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 84.2 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 242.5 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Egar images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 32.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.9 kB or 24% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (62%)
90
34
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Egar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sk
1364 ms
bootstrap.min.css
353 ms
bootstrap-responsive.min.css
237 ms
bootstrap-image-gallery.min.css
239 ms
jquery.js
594 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.2.custom.min.js
819 ms
jquery.multiselect.min.js
238 ms
jquery.multiselect.filter.js
364 ms
blockUI.js
472 ms
egar.js
704 ms
jquery.raty.min.js
468 ms
jquery.scrollTo-1.4.3.1-min.js
472 ms
select2.min.js
705 ms
select2_locale_sk.js
601 ms
bootstrap-dropdown.js
601 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
714 ms
jquery.smooth-scroll.min.js
710 ms
lightbox.js
715 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.js
851 ms
jhashtable-2.1.min.js
853 ms
jquery-numberformatter-1.2.3.min.js
854 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
855 ms
jquery.cookie.js
854 ms
js
85 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.2.custom.css
933 ms
jquery.multiselect.css
942 ms
jquery.multiselect.filter.css
941 ms
select2.css
943 ms
egar.css
1074 ms
jsDatePick_rtl.css
952 ms
jcarousel.css
1053 ms
lightbox.css
1070 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
1071 ms
css
38 ms
messages_sk.js
1089 ms
adsbygoogle.js
6 ms
conversion.js
21 ms
retargeting.js
441 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
4 ms
analytics.js
30 ms
growl-check.png
168 ms
autodiely-egar.png
167 ms
all.js
27 ms
button-submit-bg.png
241 ms
sk.png
239 ms
cz.png
277 ms
topmenu.jpg
239 ms
leftmenu-header.png
300 ms
back-gradient.png
299 ms
plus.gif
299 ms
9_7S_tWeGDh5Pq3u05RVkiZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
65 ms
linkid.js
63 ms
ca-pub-7372799032250166.js
242 ms
zrt_lookup.html
244 ms
show_ads_impl.js
176 ms
cat_266.jpg
217 ms
text_back.png
217 ms
bottom_white_gradient.png
219 ms
bottom_grey_gradient.png
325 ms
title_back.png
329 ms
cat_58.jpg
327 ms
cat_208.jpg
323 ms
cat_69.jpg
324 ms
cat_153.jpg
339 ms
cat_296.jpg
443 ms
cat_162.jpg
444 ms
cat_316.jpg
443 ms
cat_119.jpg
446 ms
cat_246.jpg
449 ms
cat_2.jpg
457 ms
cat_343.jpg
561 ms
cat_137.jpg
563 ms
cat_279.jpg
563 ms
cat_303.jpg
565 ms
footer.png
574 ms
236 ms
198 ms
collect
139 ms
xd_arbiter.php
158 ms
xd_arbiter.php
187 ms
retargeting
156 ms
select2.png
424 ms
multiselect-bg.png
530 ms
ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png
529 ms
arrow-down-white.png
529 ms
loading.gif
533 ms
close.png
544 ms
ads
58 ms
osd.js
35 ms
like.php
36 ms
42 ms
h5Lp5Et_eC4.js
33 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
30 ms
egar.eu accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
egar.eu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
egar.eu SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
SK
SK
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Egar.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Slovak is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Egar.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
egar.eu
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Egar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: