Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

ej.ru

"Ежедневный журнал" - интернет-издание

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

314 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

157 ms

ej.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit ej.ru now to see the best up-to-date Ej content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ej.ru

Visit ej.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Ej.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 314 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ej.ru performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

33/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value770 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.7 s

79/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ej.ru

314 ms

main.css

305 ms

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

489 ms

script.js

216 ms

urchin.js

17 ms

Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 39% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Ej.ru, 10% (9 requests) were made to Img.mediaplex.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to C.betrad.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Ej.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 459.3 kB (54%)

Content Size

849.0 kB

After Optimization

389.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Ej.ru main page is 849.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 433.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 11.3 kB

  • Original 15.2 kB
  • After minification 13.0 kB
  • After compression 3.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.2 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.3 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 33.3 kB

  • Original 256.8 kB
  • After minification 223.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ej needs image optimization as it can save up to 33.3 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 294.0 kB

  • Original 433.0 kB
  • After minification 426.4 kB
  • After compression 139.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 294.0 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 120.7 kB

  • Original 144.0 kB
  • After minification 114.2 kB
  • After compression 23.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ej.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 120.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (44%)

Requests Now

85

After Optimization

48

The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ej. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ej.ru accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ej.ru best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ej.ru SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ej.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ej.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ej. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: