Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 50

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

Page Load Speed

10.2 sec in total

First Response

3 sec

Resources Loaded

6.7 sec

Page Rendered

431 ms

elagraff.com screenshot

About Website

Visit elagraff.com now to see the best up-to-date Elagraff content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about elagraff.com

Graffiti Blog News Word wide Graffiti Picture Gallery

Visit elagraff.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Elagraff.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3 sec and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

elagraff.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.1 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

elagraff.com

2985 ms

style.css

161 ms

jquery.min.js

6 ms

customSelect.jquery.js

156 ms

AC_RunActiveContent.js

206 ms

Our browser made a total of 139 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (92 requests) were addressed to the original Elagraff.com, 7% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 5% (7 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Elagraff.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 522.8 kB (18%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

2.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Elagraff.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 56.7 kB

  • Original 69.2 kB
  • After minification 66.4 kB
  • After compression 12.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 248.1 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Elagraff images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 160.7 kB

  • Original 254.7 kB
  • After minification 227.7 kB
  • After compression 94.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 160.7 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 57.3 kB

  • Original 69.3 kB
  • After minification 52.6 kB
  • After compression 12.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Elagraff.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 57.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (46%)

Requests Now

134

After Optimization

72

The browser has sent 134 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Elagraff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

elagraff.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

elagraff.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

elagraff.com SEO score

50

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Elagraff.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Elagraff.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Elagraff. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: