3.4 sec in total
572 ms
2.7 sec
205 ms
Click here to check amazing ELORX content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about elorx.com
Visit elorx.comWe analyzed Elorx.com page load time and found that the first response time was 572 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
elorx.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value8.6 s
1/100
25%
Value9.5 s
11/100
10%
Value180 ms
91/100
30%
Value0.029
100/100
15%
Value8.3 s
40/100
10%
572 ms
128 ms
220 ms
24 ms
339 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Elorx.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (924 ms) belongs to the original domain Elorx.com.
Page size can be reduced by 657.9 kB (56%)
1.2 MB
524.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Elorx.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 525.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ELORX images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 362.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 362.9 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 246.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Elorx.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 246.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (57%)
54
23
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ELORX. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
elorx.com
572 ms
styles.css
128 ms
font-awesome.min.css
220 ms
css
24 ms
bootstrap.css
339 ms
font-awesome.min.css
221 ms
magnific-popup.css
223 ms
perfect-scrollbar-0.4.5.min.css
226 ms
style.css
245 ms
default.css
329 ms
style.css
329 ms
jquery.js
584 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
357 ms
modernizr.custom.63321.js
354 ms
js_composer_front.css
447 ms
jquery.form.min.js
435 ms
scripts.js
439 ms
bootstrap.min.js
451 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
457 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
541 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-packed.js
552 ms
jquery.dropdownit.js
554 ms
jquery.mixitup.min.js
558 ms
magnific-popup.js
560 ms
masonry.min.js
688 ms
perfect-scrollbar-0.4.5.with-mousewheel.min.js
688 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
691 ms
TweenMax.min.js
771 ms
imagesloaded.js
692 ms
custom.js
692 ms
comment-reply.min.js
765 ms
js_composer_front.js
805 ms
waypoints.min.js
811 ms
analytics.js
88 ms
jens1.png
576 ms
jens_m_stober_500_sw1.png
502 ms
ard.png
252 ms
zdf.png
257 ms
swr.png
257 ms
art.png
276 ms
pro.png
356 ms
trl.png
359 ms
bild.png
362 ms
faz.png
379 ms
foc.png
490 ms
bildde.png
463 ms
sd.png
466 ms
spi.png
498 ms
ste.png
567 ms
bbc.png
570 ms
ap1.png
604 ms
ny.png
600 ms
pointer.png
610 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
13 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
13 ms
zJY4gsxBiSo5L7tNutxFNg.ttf
14 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
14 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
806 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
924 ms
collect
22 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
268 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
274 ms
elorx.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
elorx.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
elorx.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Elorx.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Elorx.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
elorx.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ELORX. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: