12.2 sec in total
2.6 sec
9.3 sec
204 ms
Visit emanuscript.in now to see the best up-to-date EManuscript content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about emanuscript.in
We boost your journals online growth. Build world-class Journals with a team of editors, design, development & strategy experts. All in one place. We can provide your journals with a variety of digita...
Visit emanuscript.inWe analyzed Emanuscript.in page load time and found that the first response time was 2.6 sec and then it took 9.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
emanuscript.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.0 s
0/100
10%
Value20.0 s
0/100
25%
Value24.9 s
0/100
10%
Value6,520 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.64
9/100
15%
Value20.3 s
2/100
10%
2624 ms
697 ms
1213 ms
544 ms
735 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Emanuscript.in, 25% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 17% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Emanuscript.in.
Page size can be reduced by 483.7 kB (60%)
809.6 kB
325.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Emanuscript.in main page is 809.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 548.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EManuscript images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 17.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 17.2 kB or 34% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 422.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Emanuscript.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 422.2 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (81%)
42
8
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EManuscript. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
emanuscript.in
2624 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
697 ms
style.min.css
1213 ms
wmac_single_81677883b36850db1a27f028e1a76565.css
544 ms
wmac_single_ec96e53e57b5d34f762d567cdb29a312.css
735 ms
wmac_single_89656ed6fb2e45c6049482e121fc2d88.css
750 ms
wmac_single_5de5cfff6fba2af917363f7eb9e79a94.css
752 ms
css
29 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1488 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1036 ms
slick.min.css
977 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
985 ms
wmac_single_042ac4523eda5fdd737f84a843238cf3.css
988 ms
wmac_single_333df1f92f6ae2ba2a08b60ae7fa4235.css
1220 ms
style.min.css
1967 ms
style.min.css
1726 ms
style.min.css
1248 ms
style.min.css
1282 ms
style.min.css
1707 ms
wmac_single_e04f8ecf1655010b1b257742ca6c270e.css
1500 ms
wmac_single_db68de6b252c0e477d96e39ccadf2315.css
1532 ms
css
25 ms
wmac_cf7a01f20d5b5c28358dd795bb31d85c.js
1844 ms
ems.png
257 ms
ems_background.jpg
753 ms
emanuscript-mid-banner-01.jpg
245 ms
testimonial.jpg
490 ms
profile-150x150.jpg
254 ms
whatsapp-logo-32x32.png
255 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
48 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
81 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
91 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf
94 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf
95 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
91 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
92 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf
92 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf
93 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
636 ms
default
117 ms
wmac_single_98f4e97f86b642bf082c65ae518ad010.css
248 ms
twk-arr-find-polyfill.js
71 ms
twk-object-values-polyfill.js
56 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
66 ms
twk-entries-polyfill.js
61 ms
twk-iterator-polyfill.js
61 ms
twk-promise-polyfill.js
85 ms
twk-main.js
126 ms
twk-vendor.js
77 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
200 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
263 ms
twk-runtime.js
80 ms
twk-app.js
147 ms
emanuscript.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
emanuscript.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
emanuscript.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Emanuscript.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Emanuscript.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
emanuscript.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EManuscript. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: