Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

321 ms

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

90 ms

emaxme.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Emaxme content for United Arab Emirates. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about emaxme.com

Splash Landing Page

Visit emaxme.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Emaxme.com page load time and found that the first response time was 321 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

emaxme.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.3 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value810 ms

36/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.96

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.4 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

emax

321 ms

1a22c8f6.vendor.css

243 ms

82a967e8.lms-blessed1.css

442 ms

82a967e8.lms.css

410 ms

ee2933de.core.js

167 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Emaxme.com, 21% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 7% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (442 ms) relates to the external source Landmarkshops.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 68.8 kB (69%)

Content Size

99.5 kB

After Optimization

30.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Emaxme.com main page is 99.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 53.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 36.8 kB

  • Original 45.7 kB
  • After minification 45.2 kB
  • After compression 9.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 53.8 kB
  • After minification 53.8 kB
  • After compression 21.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 59% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (42%)

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Emaxme. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

emaxme.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

emaxme.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

emaxme.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Emaxme.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Emaxme.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Emaxme. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: