Tools & Wizards About Us
embroiderydigitizing.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 70% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

embroiderydigitizing.org

Embroidery Digitizing and Vector Art Blog - A community Sharing Latest Ideas & Tips on Embroidery Digitizing, Softwares

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

684 ms

embroiderydigitizing.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to embroiderydigitizing.org homepage info - get ready to check Embroidery Digitizing best content right away, or after learning these important things about embroiderydigitizing.org

Embroidery digitizing blog reporting on latest trends, guide, tips and tricks, faq and knowledge base in embroidery design, digitizing, vector art, digitizing softwares and machines.

Visit embroiderydigitizing.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Embroiderydigitizing.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

embroiderydigitizing.org performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

32/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,160 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.9 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.embroiderydigitizing.org

1179 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

73 ms

style.min.css

206 ms

styles.css

614 ms

frontend.min.css

135 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Embroiderydigitizing.org, 6% (3 requests) were made to Maxcdn.icons8.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Embroiderydigitizing.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 90.0 kB (11%)

Content Size

814.3 kB

After Optimization

724.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Embroiderydigitizing.org main page is 814.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 592.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 41.2 kB

  • Original 51.4 kB
  • After minification 51.1 kB
  • After compression 10.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 592.9 kB
  • After minification 591.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Embroidery Digitizing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 14.1 kB

  • Original 76.4 kB
  • After minification 75.9 kB
  • After compression 62.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 14.1 kB or 18% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 33.6 kB

  • Original 93.6 kB
  • After minification 93.5 kB
  • After compression 60.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Embroiderydigitizing.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 33.6 kB or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (80%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Embroidery Digitizing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.embroiderydigitizing.org

www.embroiderydigitizing.org

1179 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

73 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

206 ms

styles.css

styles.css

614 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

135 ms

wp-date-remover-public.css

wp-date-remover-public.css

141 ms

essb-animations.min.css

essb-animations.min.css

149 ms

easy-social-share-buttons.min.css

easy-social-share-buttons.min.css

150 ms

essb-followers-counter.min.css

essb-followers-counter.min.css

209 ms

wp-featherlight.min.css

wp-featherlight.min.css

221 ms

lightslider.css

lightslider.css

222 ms

gts-style.css

gts-style.css

221 ms

style.css

style.css

278 ms

css

css

23 ms

line-awesome-font-awesome.min.css

line-awesome-font-awesome.min.css

28 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

337 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

285 ms

wp-date-remover-public.js

wp-date-remover-public.js

287 ms

lightslider.min.js

lightslider.min.js

287 ms

widget.js

widget.js

406 ms

index.js

index.js

787 ms

index.js

index.js

564 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

351 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

357 ms

superfish.min.js

superfish.min.js

402 ms

superfish.args.min.js

superfish.args.min.js

425 ms

skip-links.min.js

skip-links.min.js

424 ms

api.js

api.js

72 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

468 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

493 ms

index.js

index.js

784 ms

wpFeatherlight.pkgd.min.js

wpFeatherlight.pkgd.min.js

535 ms

business-pro.min.js

business-pro.min.js

569 ms

menus.min.js

menus.min.js

780 ms

styles.css

styles.css

781 ms

essb-followers-counter.min.css

essb-followers-counter.min.css

781 ms

hover.css

hover.css

781 ms

logo-1.png

logo-1.png

124 ms

hero.jpg

hero.jpg

347 ms

vectorart-620x380.jpg

vectorart-620x380.jpg

199 ms

pile-of-threads-3563554-620x380.jpg

pile-of-threads-3563554-620x380.jpg

261 ms

Wilcom-620x380.jpg

Wilcom-620x380.jpg

202 ms

slider3.jpg

slider3.jpg

347 ms

5aU69_a8oxmIdGl4Ag.woff

5aU69_a8oxmIdGl4Ag.woff

76 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff

77 ms

line-awesome.svg

line-awesome.svg

78 ms

line-awesome.woff

line-awesome.woff

74 ms

essb-socialfollowers.woff

essb-socialfollowers.woff

135 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

130 ms

essb-core.min.js

essb-core.min.js

95 ms

Accessibility Review

embroiderydigitizing.org accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

embroiderydigitizing.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

embroiderydigitizing.org SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Embroiderydigitizing.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Embroiderydigitizing.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

embroiderydigitizing.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Embroidery Digitizing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: