8.7 sec in total
3.7 sec
4.8 sec
215 ms
Welcome to emilyrogan.com homepage info - get ready to check Emilyrogan best content right away, or after learning these important things about emilyrogan.com
Writing professional from Long Island, New York. Accurate, reliable reporting. Clean, concise copy. Intentional writing without the fluff.
Visit emilyrogan.comWe analyzed Emilyrogan.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.7 sec and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
emilyrogan.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
85/100
10%
Value4.1 s
46/100
25%
Value3.6 s
87/100
10%
Value800 ms
36/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.7 s
80/100
10%
3694 ms
136 ms
265 ms
879 ms
348 ms
Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Emilyrogan.com, 21% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 16% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Emilyrogan.com.
Page size can be reduced by 116.4 kB (38%)
310.1 kB
193.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Emilyrogan.com main page is 310.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 155.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 8.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.3 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Emilyrogan needs image optimization as it can save up to 23.7 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 69.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 69.1 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Emilyrogan.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (20%)
15
12
The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Emilyrogan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
emilyrogan.com
3694 ms
style.css
136 ms
bg.png
265 ms
jquery.js
879 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
348 ms
anti-captcha-0.3.js.php
262 ms
css
25 ms
drop-downs.min.js
132 ms
ga.js
26 ms
bg-header.png
529 ms
sprites.png
590 ms
Unknown-300x63.jpeg
492 ms
asjalogolink02.gif
494 ms
__utm.gif
21 ms
__utm.gif
7 ms
__utm.gif
7 ms
APH4jr0uSos5wiut5cpjrnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
7 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
9 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMQFhaRv2pGgT5Kf0An0s4MM.woff
18 ms
emilyrogan.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
emilyrogan.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
emilyrogan.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Emilyrogan.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Emilyrogan.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
emilyrogan.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Emilyrogan. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: