2.1 sec in total
100 ms
1.3 sec
737 ms
Welcome to emold.net homepage info - get ready to check E Mold best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about emold.net
This is my page
Visit emold.netWe analyzed Emold.net page load time and found that the first response time was 100 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
emold.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
63/100
10%
Value3.4 s
66/100
25%
Value3.4 s
90/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.6 s
81/100
10%
100 ms
46 ms
54 ms
52 ms
52 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Emold.net, 1% (1 request) were made to Hovertree.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Hovertree.com.
Page size can be reduced by 183.7 kB (25%)
746.2 kB
562.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Emold.net main page is 746.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 489.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.7 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. E Mold images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 99.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 99.3 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Emold.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (25%)
73
55
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E Mold. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
emold.net
100 ms
style.css
46 ms
all.css
54 ms
slidstyle.css
52 ms
scoll.css
52 ms
koala.min.1.5.js
75 ms
jquery.min.js
118 ms
main.js
72 ms
jsScroller.js
86 ms
scroll.js
85 ms
jquery.lazyload.min.js
84 ms
jquery.slides.js
190 ms
marquee.js
96 ms
terminator2.2.min.js
1028 ms
headbj3.jpg
214 ms
logo.png
160 ms
loginIcon.png
159 ms
menubg.jpg
160 ms
menuIcon.png
162 ms
tb.png
163 ms
icon13.jpg
152 ms
icon10.jpg
162 ms
icon11.png
151 ms
pic01.jpg
168 ms
pic03.jpg
178 ms
inj_1.png
163 ms
split.jpg
162 ms
imgbg_1.jpg
163 ms
img3.jpg
164 ms
img4.jpg
178 ms
img5.jpg
166 ms
img6.jpg
164 ms
img7.jpg
164 ms
img8.jpg
177 ms
1_6.jpg
191 ms
bgDescription.png
178 ms
1_5.jpg
178 ms
1_4.jpg
192 ms
1_3.jpg
208 ms
1_2.jpg
197 ms
1_1.jpg
191 ms
pla_hbj.jpg
189 ms
grey.gif
192 ms
index2.gif
291 ms
callus.jpg
207 ms
adv.jpg
238 ms
pro1.jpg
215 ms
gq01.jpg
218 ms
pro2.jpg
231 ms
gq02.jpg
230 ms
supplylist
274 ms
pro3.jpg
97 ms
gq03.jpg
98 ms
pro4.jpg
110 ms
gq05.jpg
110 ms
pro5.jpg
115 ms
pro6.jpg
109 ms
pro7.jpg
112 ms
pro8.jpg
123 ms
gq06.jpg
123 ms
pro9.jpg
128 ms
head_gy1.jpg
133 ms
logos1.jpg
133 ms
logos2.jpg
145 ms
logos3.jpg
144 ms
logos4.jpg
148 ms
logos5.jpg
143 ms
facebookIcon.png
144 ms
phone.png
145 ms
chat.png
156 ms
cards.png
156 ms
pallets.png
155 ms
turnover.png
159 ms
plastic%20drums.png
159 ms
pipe.jpg
165 ms
emold.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.
Definition list items are not wrapped in <dl> elements
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
emold.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
emold.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Emold.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Emold.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
emold.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of E Mold. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: