Tools & Wizards About Us
ena.se screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

ena.se

HOME - ENA Agency | Digital Agency in Sweden, Singapore & Portugal

Page Load Speed

5.8 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

ena.se screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing ENA content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ena.se

E-commerceWeb DesignUX/UIIntranetLMSGraphic DesignVideoPhotographyCopywriting3D Visualization1/4 Digital DesignWe combine digital tools, platforms and

Visit ena.se

Key Findings

We analyzed Ena.se page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ena.se performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

30/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.6 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value500 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.603

10/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.9 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.ena.se

1286 ms

loaders.min.css

310 ms

preloader.min.css

312 ms

dipi-layout-importer-public.css

317 ms

popup_effect.min.css

360 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Ena.se, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Ena.se.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 413.8 kB (22%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ena.se main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 358.6 kB

  • Original 418.4 kB
  • After minification 400.1 kB
  • After compression 59.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 358.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 47.6 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 986.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ENA images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

  • Original 388.2 kB
  • After minification 387.7 kB
  • After compression 384.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

  • Original 82.7 kB
  • After minification 82.6 kB
  • After compression 78.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ena.se has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (69%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ENA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.ena.se

www.ena.se

1286 ms

loaders.min.css

loaders.min.css

310 ms

preloader.min.css

preloader.min.css

312 ms

dipi-layout-importer-public.css

dipi-layout-importer-public.css

317 ms

popup_effect.min.css

popup_effect.min.css

360 ms

dipi-font.min.css

dipi-font.min.css

361 ms

general.min.css

general.min.css

412 ms

hamburgers.min.css

hamburgers.min.css

414 ms

css

css

31 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

430 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

376 ms

css

css

19 ms

style.css

style.css

375 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

376 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

409 ms

public.min.js

public.min.js

411 ms

preloader.min.js

preloader.min.js

494 ms

dipi-layout-importer-public.js

dipi-layout-importer-public.js

496 ms

hamburger.min.js

hamburger.min.js

482 ms

et-core-unified-2.min.css

et-core-unified-2.min.css

397 ms

css

css

19 ms

swiper.5.3.8.min.css

swiper.5.3.8.min.css

271 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

288 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

326 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

366 ms

modernizr.custom.js

modernizr.custom.js

367 ms

popup_effect.min.js

popup_effect.min.js

365 ms

scroll-top.min.js

scroll-top.min.js

366 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

484 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

550 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

662 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

469 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

468 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

468 ms

common.js

common.js

591 ms

protection.js

protection.js

591 ms

ResizeSensor.js

ResizeSensor.js

575 ms

HoverBox.min.js

HoverBox.min.js

591 ms

easypiechart.js

easypiechart.js

655 ms

circliful.js

circliful.js

677 ms

Counter.min.js

Counter.min.js

708 ms

swiper.5.3.8.min.js

swiper.5.3.8.min.js

833 ms

magnific-popup.min.js

magnific-popup.min.js

695 ms

Carousel.min.js

Carousel.min.js

761 ms

jquery.exitintent.min.js

jquery.exitintent.min.js

761 ms

motion-effects.js

motion-effects.js

849 ms

ENA-vit-logotyp-2022-RETINA.png

ENA-vit-logotyp-2022-RETINA.png

430 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

557 ms

The-WKND-iPhone-Mockup-1920-%C3%97-1080-px-2560-%C3%97-1434-px-2560-%C3%97-1434-px-940-%C3%97-1000-px-1000-x-320-px-1.png

The-WKND-iPhone-Mockup-1920-%C3%97-1080-px-2560-%C3%97-1434-px-2560-%C3%97-1434-px-940-%C3%97-1000-px-1000-x-320-px-1.png

882 ms

108261959_3690838187598290_7814785287903475135_n.jpg

108261959_3690838187598290_7814785287903475135_n.jpg

1160 ms

110285220_3690838180931624_5397896749921168276_n.jpg

110285220_3690838180931624_5397896749921168276_n.jpg

1238 ms

DSC02206-HDR-scaled.jpg

DSC02206-HDR-scaled.jpg

1241 ms

ENA-vit-logotyp-2022-500x178-72dpi.png

ENA-vit-logotyp-2022-500x178-72dpi.png

799 ms

ENA-logotyp-2022-RETINA.png

ENA-logotyp-2022-RETINA.png

800 ms

1-2.png

1-2.png

881 ms

2-2.png

2-2.png

882 ms

3-2.png

3-2.png

975 ms

4-2.png

4-2.png

976 ms

5.png

5.png

976 ms

6.png

6.png

1058 ms

7.png

7.png

1059 ms

font

font

42 ms

font

font

31 ms

font

font

183 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

861 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

590 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

579 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

779 ms

font

font

68 ms

et-divi-dynamic-tb-37100-2-late.css

et-divi-dynamic-tb-37100-2-late.css

587 ms

font

font

87 ms

Accessibility Review

ena.se accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ena.se best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ena.se SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    SV

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ena.se can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Swedish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Ena.se main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ena.se

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ENA. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: