Tools & Wizards About Us
enafix.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 5

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

enafix.in

Anti-Decay Toothpaste | Safe for all Age Group - EnaFix

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

301 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

181 ms

enafix.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ena Fix content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about enafix.in

Enafix is the toothpaste to prevent and fight dental caries in all age group. It fixes the tooth enamel & protects and strengthens teeth.

Visit enafix.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Enafix.in page load time and found that the first response time was 301 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

enafix.in performance score

5

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.1 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,820 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.048

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.8 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

enafix.in

301 ms

www.enafix.in

443 ms

reset.css

139 ms

skeleton.css

139 ms

style.css

141 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Enafix.in, 9% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to V2.zopim.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (790 ms) belongs to the original domain Enafix.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 18.8 kB (29%)

Content Size

64.4 kB

After Optimization

45.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Enafix.in main page is 64.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 38.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 18.7 kB

  • Original 25.6 kB
  • After minification 24.7 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.7 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 663 B
  • After minification 663 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ena Fix images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 84 B

  • Original 38.2 kB
  • After minification 38.2 kB
  • After compression 38.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (44%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

24

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ena Fix. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

enafix.in

enafix.in

301 ms

www.enafix.in

www.enafix.in

443 ms

reset.css

reset.css

139 ms

skeleton.css

skeleton.css

139 ms

style.css

style.css

141 ms

superfish.css

superfish.css

139 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

141 ms

jquery-1.7.1.min.js

jquery-1.7.1.min.js

219 ms

script.js

script.js

211 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

294 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

227 ms

jquery.mobilemenu.js

jquery.mobilemenu.js

212 ms

raphael-1.5.2-min.js

raphael-1.5.2-min.js

303 ms

jquery.ui.totop.js

jquery.ui.totop.js

276 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

277 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

283 ms

Placeholders.min.js

Placeholders.min.js

282 ms

jquery.accordion.js

jquery.accordion.js

339 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

374 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

49 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

204 ms

index.jpg

index.jpg

364 ms

logo.png

logo.png

218 ms

phone.png

phone.png

254 ms

mail.png

mail.png

270 ms

fb.png

fb.png

338 ms

twit.png

twit.png

339 ms

menu-separator.png

menu-separator.png

339 ms

menu-hover.gif

menu-hover.gif

340 ms

group-logo.png

group-logo.png

340 ms

bwdc-icon.png

bwdc-icon.png

357 ms

shop-online.png

shop-online.png

368 ms

snapdeal.png

snapdeal.png

387 ms

amazon.png

amazon.png

405 ms

shopclues.png

shopclues.png

407 ms

ebay.png

ebay.png

423 ms

fkart.png

fkart.png

428 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

10 ms

collect

collect

4 ms

collect

collect

52 ms

ubuntu-light.woff

ubuntu-light.woff

790 ms

ga.js

ga.js

20 ms

widget_v2.135.js

widget_v2.135.js

18 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

72 ms

avatar_simple_visitor.png

avatar_simple_visitor.png

81 ms

totop.jpg

totop.jpg

64 ms

aL63HcygAAVYuCCsAAA==

aL63HcygAAVYuCCsAAA==

1 ms

Accessibility Review

enafix.in accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

enafix.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

enafix.in SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Enafix.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Enafix.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

enafix.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ena Fix. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: