Tools & Wizards About Us
energievergelijking.nl screenshot

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

energievergelijking.nl

Energie Vergelijking -

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

277 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

382 ms

energievergelijking.nl screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Energie Vergelijking content for Netherlands. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about energievergelijking.nl

Energie vergelijken en tot €700 P/j besparen? Vergelijk energie onafhankelijk met onze energievergelijker en bespaar fors op uw energiekosten.

Visit energievergelijking.nl

Key Findings

We analyzed Energievergelijking.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 277 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

energievergelijking.nl performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

57/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value570 ms

52/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.1 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

energievergelijking.nl

277 ms

www.energievergelijking.nl

984 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

285 ms

admin-ajax.php

650 ms

css

64 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 39% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Energievergelijking.nl, 42% (32 requests) were made to Partners.easyswitch.nl and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Energievergelijking.nl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 489.3 kB (64%)

Content Size

770.2 kB

After Optimization

280.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Energievergelijking.nl main page is 770.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 327.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 47.8 kB

  • Original 61.6 kB
  • After minification 60.3 kB
  • After compression 13.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 12.4 kB

  • Original 110.7 kB
  • After minification 98.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Energie Vergelijking needs image optimization as it can save up to 12.4 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 199.6 kB

  • Original 327.2 kB
  • After minification 306.1 kB
  • After compression 127.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 199.6 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 229.5 kB

  • Original 270.7 kB
  • After minification 231.3 kB
  • After compression 41.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Energievergelijking.nl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 229.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (67%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Energie Vergelijking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

energievergelijking.nl

energievergelijking.nl

277 ms

www.energievergelijking.nl

www.energievergelijking.nl

984 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

285 ms

admin-ajax.php

admin-ajax.php

650 ms

css

css

64 ms

386 ms

unsemantic-grid.min.css

unsemantic-grid.min.css

293 ms

style.css

style.css

279 ms

mobile.min.css

mobile.min.css

319 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

521 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

626 ms

widget-overstappers.php

widget-overstappers.php

485 ms

iframe.js

iframe.js

398 ms

506 ms

js.min.js

js.min.js

524 ms

navigation.min.js

navigation.min.js

627 ms

dropdown.min.js

dropdown.min.js

730 ms

navigation-search.min.js

navigation-search.min.js

753 ms

back-to-top.min.js

back-to-top.min.js

767 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

818 ms

tabby.js

tabby.js

835 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

52 ms

energie-vergelijken-voordelen.png

energie-vergelijken-voordelen.png

210 ms

energie_logo.png

energie_logo.png

531 ms

grafiek.jpg

grafiek.jpg

624 ms

goedkope-energie-296x300.png

goedkope-energie-296x300.png

613 ms

123_overstapservice.png

123_overstapservice.png

614 ms

vergelijk.png

vergelijk.png

615 ms

overstappen.png

overstappen.png

626 ms

bespaar.png

bespaar.png

791 ms

beste-energievergelijker-wua.png

beste-energievergelijker-wua.png

856 ms

qshop-keurmerk.png

qshop-keurmerk.png

875 ms

vergelijk-energie

vergelijk-energie

430 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1090 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1122 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

collect

collect

55 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

39 ms

mootools.js

mootools.js

191 ms

comparison.js

comparison.js

91 ms

validate.js

validate.js

174 ms

system.css

system.css

248 ms

general.css

general.css

255 ms

template.css

template.css

358 ms

common.js

common.js

273 ms

informationPopup.js

informationPopup.js

265 ms

homepage_showMenu.js

homepage_showMenu.js

277 ms

custom.css

custom.css

328 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

37 ms

main.css

main.css

89 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

90 ms

overstappen-logo.png

overstappen-logo.png

82 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

92 ms

breadcrumb_left.png

breadcrumb_left.png

96 ms

breadcrumb_right.png

breadcrumb_right.png

97 ms

breadcrumb_divider.png

breadcrumb_divider.png

97 ms

corner_topleft.png

corner_topleft.png

97 ms

corner_topright.png

corner_topright.png

150 ms

expand.gif

expand.gif

164 ms

input-gradient.png

input-gradient.png

165 ms

man_1.png

man_1.png

177 ms

man_2.png

man_2.png

175 ms

man_3.png

man_3.png

174 ms

man_4.png

man_4.png

234 ms

man_5.png

man_5.png

251 ms

man_x.png

man_x.png

245 ms

button_40px_left.png

button_40px_left.png

261 ms

button_40px_right.png

button_40px_right.png

262 ms

dot.png

dot.png

261 ms

16 ms

38 ms

30 ms

collect

collect

37 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

19 ms

nr-885.min.js

nr-885.min.js

45 ms

Accessibility Review

energievergelijking.nl accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

energievergelijking.nl best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

energievergelijking.nl SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Energievergelijking.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Energievergelijking.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

energievergelijking.nl

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Energie Vergelijking. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: