4.1 sec in total
414 ms
2.9 sec
770 ms
Welcome to engi.eu homepage info - get ready to check Engi best content right away, or after learning these important things about engi.eu
Visit engi.euWe analyzed Engi.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 414 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
engi.eu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
28/100
10%
Value9.3 s
1/100
25%
Value7.7 s
25/100
10%
Value350 ms
73/100
30%
Value0.078
95/100
15%
Value7.9 s
43/100
10%
414 ms
427 ms
937 ms
115 ms
213 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Engi.eu, 74% (26 requests) were made to Nidosineurope.eu and 11% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (937 ms) relates to the external source Nidosineurope.eu.
Page size can be reduced by 438.7 kB (77%)
568.7 kB
130.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Engi.eu main page is 568.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 346.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.7 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 122.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 122.1 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 295.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Engi.eu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 295.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (74%)
27
7
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Engi. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
engi.eu
414 ms
engi.eu
427 ms
nidosineurope.eu
937 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
115 ms
style.min.css
213 ms
style.css
275 ms
frontend.css
288 ms
public.css
316 ms
css
50 ms
icomoon.css
317 ms
royalslider.css
314 ms
font-awesome.css
305 ms
fancybox.css
367 ms
animations.css
380 ms
shortcodes.css
398 ms
grid.css
418 ms
style.css
420 ms
jquery.js
491 ms
modernizr.min.js
446 ms
scripts.js
464 ms
comment-reply.min.js
465 ms
jquery.plugins.min.js
748 ms
jquery.register.js
747 ms
wp-embed.min.js
748 ms
nidos-logo.png
276 ms
Header_home_1200x356.png
468 ms
Europa_klein.png
203 ms
footer_engi_1200x158px.png
402 ms
mem8YaGs126MiZpBA-UFVZ0e.ttf
127 ms
mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UNirkOUuhs.ttf
130 ms
mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UN7rgOUuhs.ttf
143 ms
mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UN8rsOUuhs.ttf
149 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
196 ms
analytics.js
111 ms
collect
15 ms
engi.eu accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
engi.eu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
engi.eu SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Engi.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Engi.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
engi.eu
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Engi. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: