37.8 sec in total
472 ms
26.5 sec
10.9 sec
Visit engineeringcivil.com now to see the best up-to-date Engineering Civil content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about engineeringcivil.com
Visit engineeringcivil.comWe analyzed Engineeringcivil.com page load time and found that the first response time was 472 ms and then it took 37.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
engineeringcivil.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.9 s
1/100
10%
Value9.6 s
0/100
25%
Value9.4 s
12/100
10%
Value1,820 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.037
100/100
15%
Value12.8 s
13/100
10%
472 ms
188 ms
245 ms
379 ms
541 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Engineeringcivil.com, 11% (8 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com and 11% (8 requests) were made to Scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) relates to the external source Tpc.googlesyndication.com.
Page size can be reduced by 639.0 kB (50%)
1.3 MB
629.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Engineeringcivil.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 942.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Engineering Civil images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 550.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 550.0 kB or 58% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 38.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Engineeringcivil.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 38.9 kB or 52% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (57%)
70
30
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Engineering Civil. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.engineeringcivil.com
472 ms
style.css
188 ms
styles.css
245 ms
email-css.css
379 ms
jquery.js
541 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
533 ms
comments.css
342 ms
jquery.min.js
879 ms
adsbygoogle.js
244 ms
quote.min.js
1953 ms
jquery.autogrow-textarea.min.js
1953 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1953 ms
jquery.scrollTo-1.4.2-min.js
1954 ms
commenting.min.js
1952 ms
scripts.js
1952 ms
email-js.js
1953 ms
wp-embed.min.js
2171 ms
form.js
2170 ms
brand
1935 ms
join.gif
1180 ms
logo.png
1178 ms
new.gif
1178 ms
6th-Rail-Engineering-Maintenance-Summit-2017-144-144.jpg
1178 ms
EQUIP-GLOBAL-SKYSCRAPERS-INDIA-SUMMIT-2017-144-144.jpg
1177 ms
5th-Urban-Underground-Space-Tunnelling-Asia-Summit-2017_144-144.jpg
1178 ms
Equip-Global-Coastal-and-Environment-Summit-2017_144-144.jpg
1177 ms
EQUIP-GLOBAL-AIRFIELD-PAVEMENT-DESIGN_144-144.jpg
1123 ms
civil-engineering-forum.jpg
1122 ms
engineeringcivil.com-awarded-best-online-publication-by-CIDC-2013.gif
1121 ms
googlelogo_lightgrey_46x16dp.png
1083 ms
ca-pub-9766332094014873.js
566 ms
zrt_lookup.html
2876 ms
show_ads_impl.js
921 ms
printfriendly.js
2274 ms
counter.js
2070 ms
ads
2185 ms
osd.js
496 ms
t.php
1327 ms
all.js
1266 ms
m_js_controller.js
2008 ms
abg.js
2983 ms
m_window_focus_non_hydra.js
2984 ms
osd_listener.js
3003 ms
m_qs_click_protection.js
3002 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_black.png
652 ms
1969 ms
x_button_blue2.png
1025 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
1847 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
2028 ms
iconx2-000000.png
722 ms
googlelogo_dark_color_84x28dp.png
1308 ms
s
337 ms
transparent.png
739 ms
ping
1585 ms
ui
120 ms
like_box.php
494 ms
like_box.php
809 ms
fpJ246J2fJ0bYHH6KdX6NZQGrKMRoryxUcO6omD8DP8.js
258 ms
NGU_mTNA751.css
810 ms
XzwtNvyJD3B.js
1087 ms
YhkywtmtFU0.js
2660 ms
T-D_V7C7Ph6.js
2659 ms
activeview
1949 ms
1017337_604343336281808_970473592_n.jpg
2744 ms
wMkwmq5_RAN.png
303 ms
1010626_604344062948402_325187355_n.jpg
2928 ms
19260751_1218895631575759_3133778044087095319_n.jpg
2776 ms
18485435_1205836906205755_4720798668336519362_n.jpg
2775 ms
1959453_1386099034998781_800056017_n.jpg
2827 ms
19437620_1356200304471120_6043293446774948636_n.jpg
2775 ms
1017337_604343336281808_970473592_n.jpg
2829 ms
14441058_916861225086200_2114304292833687063_n.jpg
2785 ms
engineeringcivil.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
engineeringcivil.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
engineeringcivil.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Engineeringcivil.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Engineeringcivil.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
engineeringcivil.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Engineering Civil. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: