Tools & Wizards About Us
enmarkstations.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    28% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 90% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    57% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

enmarkstations.net

Enmarket Convenience Stores - fresh choice, friendly faceEnmarket

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

47 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

enmarkstations.net screenshot

About Website

Visit enmarkstations.net now to see the best up-to-date Enmarkstations content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about enmarkstations.net

At enmarket, convenience store customers can find healthy snack options, high quality fuel and gas and friendly face

Visit enmarkstations.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Enmarkstations.net page load time and found that the first response time was 47 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

enmarkstations.net performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value15.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value31.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,030 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.5 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

enmarkstations.net

47 ms

enmarket.com

70 ms

enmarket.com

149 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

52 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

97 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Enmarkstations.net, 66% (41 requests) were made to Enmarket.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (533 ms) relates to the external source Enmarket.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 121.7 kB (4%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Enmarkstations.net main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 71.7 kB

  • Original 90.4 kB
  • After minification 88.6 kB
  • After compression 18.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 47.7 kB

  • Original 2.7 MB
  • After minification 2.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Enmarkstations images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 6.8 kB
  • After minification 6.8 kB
  • After compression 4.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.3 kB or 33% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (60%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Enmarkstations. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

enmarkstations.net

enmarkstations.net

47 ms

enmarket.com

enmarket.com

70 ms

enmarket.com

enmarket.com

149 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

52 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

97 ms

23-layout.css

23-layout.css

105 ms

default.min.css

default.min.css

93 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

100 ms

jquery.magnificpopup.min.css

jquery.magnificpopup.min.css

114 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

163 ms

base.min.css

base.min.css

143 ms

skin-627bd7e018274.css

skin-627bd7e018274.css

131 ms

css

css

98 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

148 ms

smartslider.min.css

smartslider.min.css

135 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

181 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

179 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

178 ms

js

js

157 ms

n2.min.js

n2.min.js

179 ms

smartslider-frontend.min.js

smartslider-frontend.min.js

369 ms

ss-simple.min.js

ss-simple.min.js

256 ms

smartslider-backgroundanimation.min.js

smartslider-backgroundanimation.min.js

363 ms

w-arrow-image.min.js

w-arrow-image.min.js

364 ms

snippet.js

snippet.js

155 ms

23-layout.js

23-layout.js

341 ms

jquery.ba-throttle-debounce.min.js

jquery.ba-throttle-debounce.min.js

341 ms

jquery.magnificpopup.min.js

jquery.magnificpopup.min.js

341 ms

theme.min.js

theme.min.js

342 ms

e-202240.js

e-202240.js

128 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

160 ms

enmarket-logo.jpg

enmarket-logo.jpg

125 ms

enmarket-green-leaf.png

enmarket-green-leaf.png

212 ms

ENMARK-16412_Savannah-Hometown-Campaign-webslider2.jpg

ENMARK-16412_Savannah-Hometown-Campaign-webslider2.jpg

302 ms

Mobile-App-Hero.jpg

Mobile-App-Hero.jpg

533 ms

Enmarket-your-friendly-convenience-store.png

Enmarket-your-friendly-convenience-store.png

210 ms

Enmarket.OurStory.image_.png

Enmarket.OurStory.image_.png

213 ms

Oak_Canopy_m.png

Oak_Canopy_m.png

280 ms

Fresh-choices-landscape.png

Fresh-choices-landscape.png

211 ms

Promotions-landscape-landscape.png

Promotions-landscape-landscape.png

512 ms

Business-Advantage-card-landscape.jpg

Business-Advantage-card-landscape.jpg

278 ms

locations-e1538677922219-landscape.png

locations-e1538677922219-landscape.png

280 ms

enriching-life-in-the-communities-we-serve-since-1964-landscape.png

enriching-life-in-the-communities-we-serve-since-1964-landscape.png

300 ms

freshfaces-landscape-landscape.png

freshfaces-landscape-landscape.png

297 ms

855745eb-a42d-4cc6-9be3-4476d8189730

855745eb-a42d-4cc6-9be3-4476d8189730

265 ms

ahcfv8qz1zt6hCC5G4F_P4ASlUuYow.ttf

ahcfv8qz1zt6hCC5G4F_P4ASlUuYow.ttf

155 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

173 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

176 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

176 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

255 ms

pixel.js

pixel.js

390 ms

pixel.js

pixel.js

389 ms

web-widget-framework-bec8a5ff4d17b534ed20.js

web-widget-framework-bec8a5ff4d17b534ed20.js

112 ms

280056095872449

280056095872449

128 ms

2c34376be26e8160

2c34376be26e8160

108 ms

asyncPixelSync

asyncPixelSync

6 ms

um

um

226 ms

2063914667027169

2063914667027169

122 ms

demconf.jpg

demconf.jpg

8 ms

check

check

88 ms

qmap

qmap

85 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

23 ms

Accessibility Review

enmarkstations.net accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

enmarkstations.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

enmarkstations.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Enmarkstations.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Enmarkstations.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

enmarkstations.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Enmarkstations. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: