7.1 sec in total
293 ms
6.5 sec
319 ms
Visit enta.net now to see the best up-to-date Enta content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about enta.net
Partners
Visit enta.netWe analyzed Enta.net page load time and found that the first response time was 293 ms and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
enta.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value20.4 s
0/100
25%
Value18.5 s
0/100
10%
Value2,680 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.034
100/100
15%
Value30.4 s
0/100
10%
293 ms
2412 ms
257 ms
117 ms
461 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Enta.net, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Pi.pardot.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Enta.net.
Page size can be reduced by 88.4 kB (15%)
584.2 kB
495.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Enta.net main page is 584.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 461.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.4 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Enta images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 37.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 37.9 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Enta.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (14%)
44
38
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Enta. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
enta.net
293 ms
www.enta.net
2412 ms
picturefill.js
257 ms
css
117 ms
styles.css
461 ms
slider.css
260 ms
jquery.min.js
120 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
535 ms
entanet-logo.png
737 ms
broadband-sml.jpg
810 ms
leased-line-sml.jpg
732 ms
efm-sml.jpg
813 ms
gea-sml.jpg
750 ms
ipvpn-sml.jpg
849 ms
voip-sml.jpg
1264 ms
colocation-sml.jpg
1294 ms
telecoms-sml.jpg
1277 ms
ad-7wholesale.png
1177 ms
ad-11models.png
1184 ms
Hot-100-award-2010.jpg
1215 ms
Tech-Track-100-award2010.jpg
1556 ms
cba-wholesale2015.jpg
1662 ms
deloitte-Fast-50-award.jpg
1580 ms
Guardian-tech-media-award.jpg
1628 ms
WholesaleServiceProvider.jpg
1661 ms
Channel-ISP.jpg
1661 ms
ispa_small.gif
1926 ms
analytics.js
131 ms
rotator-bg.jpg
1783 ms
linkedin.png
1827 ms
twitter.png
1982 ms
facebook2.png
1864 ms
youtube.png
1987 ms
rss.png
2171 ms
googleplus.png
2198 ms
widgets.js
258 ms
collect
136 ms
rotator-3steps.jpg
2245 ms
rotator-awards-lrg.jpg
2264 ms
rotator-choosing-ethernet.jpg
2358 ms
rotator-fttc-promo.jpg
2369 ms
linkedIn.png
591 ms
pd.js
167 ms
bg_control_nav.png
374 ms
bg_direction_nav.png
252 ms
button-gradient.jpg
251 ms
analytics
274 ms
enta.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
enta.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
enta.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Enta.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Enta.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
enta.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Enta. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: