3.4 sec in total
720 ms
2.5 sec
110 ms
Click here to check amazing EPACK content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about epack.in
EPACK Prefab is the leading manufacturer of pre-engineered and prefabricated buildings. Contact us for a free quote.
Visit epack.inWe analyzed Epack.in page load time and found that the first response time was 720 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
epack.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.8 s
4/100
10%
Value7.4 s
4/100
25%
Value10.2 s
9/100
10%
Value430 ms
64/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value7.2 s
51/100
10%
720 ms
171 ms
148 ms
155 ms
179 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Epack.in, 9% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (720 ms) belongs to the original domain Epack.in.
Page size can be reduced by 692.4 kB (35%)
2.0 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Epack.in main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EPACK images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 359.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 359.8 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 268.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Epack.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 268.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (58%)
79
33
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EPACK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.epack.in
720 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
171 ms
icon-font-style.css
148 ms
front.css
155 ms
layerslider.css
179 ms
css
40 ms
foundation.min.css
164 ms
app.css
154 ms
bbpress.css
246 ms
jquery.isotope.css
210 ms
flexslider.css
201 ms
prettyPhoto.css
211 ms
options.css
237 ms
column-style.css
228 ms
jsapi
67 ms
jquery.js
375 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
304 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
354 ms
jquery-easing-1.3.js
323 ms
jquerytransit.js
323 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
319 ms
crumina_slider.css
357 ms
js_composer_front.css
380 ms
foundation.min.js
419 ms
animation.js
390 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
430 ms
jquery.nicescroll.plus.js
400 ms
app.js
412 ms
gmap3.min.js
420 ms
jquery.color.min.js
429 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
482 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
514 ms
crumina_slider_content.js
493 ms
js_composer_front.js
492 ms
sections.css
358 ms
topmenu.css
356 ms
blocks.css
378 ms
widgets.css
387 ms
animation.css
401 ms
Slider-7.jpg
376 ms
foot-adress.png
592 ms
BGD.png
174 ms
Text3.png
175 ms
Text21.png
174 ms
Slider-9.jpg
222 ms
Bgd.png
174 ms
Text1.png
177 ms
Text2.png
176 ms
Slider-8.jpg
287 ms
bgd3.png
195 ms
text1-3.png
197 ms
text2-3.png
195 ms
Slider-10.jpg
495 ms
bdg4.png
238 ms
text1-4.png
290 ms
text2-4.png
287 ms
Epack-Polymers-Pvt-Ltd-Logo.png
70 ms
search-go.png
170 ms
arrow-drop.png
169 ms
Heading.png
171 ms
Slider-11.jpg
241 ms
bgd5.png
172 ms
text1-5.png
172 ms
text2-5.png
173 ms
Slider-12.jpg
367 ms
Black-BG.png
198 ms
Title.png
285 ms
Epack-Logo2.png
218 ms
Labour-Accomodation.png
266 ms
Site-Office.png
450 ms
Cold-Room.png
424 ms
Rite-Steel.png
425 ms
Certificate-Logos-Footer.png
318 ms
Epack-Abstract-Logo.png
372 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlFzCdIATDt8zXO3QNtzVeJ8.ttf
39 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGEBls_1aQwi4AfipSOlE3SU.ttf
38 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGGvd-IutAbwf5FQ8ZpuI2w4.ttf
39 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGGAlZ1PukdtTN2z-JxSzbe8.ttf
40 ms
fontello.svg
446 ms
fontello.ttf
430 ms
M2Jd71oPJhLKp0zdtTvoM6xot8ENfkYez2Lz7rcrw70.ttf
39 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6I48KljrVa8Zcyi9xGGohEU.ttf
38 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6KjMMkbXdLGS8FpAnMJn5J0.ttf
40 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6KQ4IK8jcFikBX2R8jKe4LU.ttf
38 ms
moon.svg
623 ms
analytics.js
13 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
499 ms
skin.css
404 ms
collect
10 ms
epack.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
epack.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
epack.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Epack.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Epack.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
epack.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of EPACK. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: